Those nominal and actual sizes bug the hell out of me!Isn't it potentially quicker and easier just to use Pythagoras and trigonometry? I appreciate that not everyone is comfortable with formulas but there are legions of online calculators.
Most of us only have access to paper as large as A4, it would probably take me longer to sit down and work out a suitable scale and then convert all of the component parts to that scale. And if I make an error, it may be less obvious that I have done so.
That said, regardless of which technique used, it becomes more difficult when working with nominal rather than finished sizes.
I am not a carpenter by trade but have never understood why, when buying timber, you are (often) presented with the nominal, rather than planned sizes. Is there a valid reason for that?
You go looking for a piece of 2" x 4", for example, and bring home a smaller size that doesn't fit!
Make the advertised sizes the finished size. I don't need to know that the piece of wood I want was bigger before it was machined to the size I need. It's common sense that a piece of 2" x 4" PAR is smaller than a piece of rough sawn, but just make the PAR the actual size it needs to be! i.e. 2" x 4" It will save customers a lot of frustration and costs. This in turn will generate more sales.