Oh dear, you boys have been busy in Mama's absence......
Indulge me by allowing me to stray off the precise topic in order to reply to the posts I have only just now seen. I am as anxious as the next for the well-being of the little girl and check for updates almost obsessively.
Softus quite rightly came to Masona's defence (Masona being another chap, like....) Am I cynical ? - no..... (Where are you, Bett ?)
Anyway to cut to the chase -
Masona remarked with sensitivity and discretion that it was not 'healthy' for small kids to be naked on the beach. I think that comment has bypassed some. I have noticed that nearly all (if not all) of you have male children and obviously (and I am not speaking anatomically here
) are male yourselves. I don't want to shock anyone of a sensitive nature who may view this post by being indelicate, but have you ever heard what can happen to a little boy if a few grains of sand get trapped in his f******* ? My point being that in the rush to prove that we are not 'inhibited' some commonsense things go out the window.
Of course Masona is right - you can just 'sense' the wrong 'uns. Paedos, rapists, psychopaths et al do not have their proclivities tattooed on their
foreheads and you can't complain about people without proof. My husband, who is extremely observant - just as well as I am singularly lacking in that department - has on numerous occasions drawn my attention to someone and said 'He/she is a funny-bunny'. I have been surprised as they looked normal to me at the time, but almost without exception they have turned up in the local paper sooner or later having done something weird or slowly but surely got madder looking by the week (like they have been turned out of some institution and are not taking their tablets).
It is true that people have got paranoid - but it is due to the world we now inhabit and I believe there ARE more active paedophiles because of the internet and the ease with which they can hook up with others of a like mind and are 'bolder' because they are now part of a brotherhood. Fifty years ago, or whatever, they generally acted in isolation.
So I have to agree with Softus on this occasion (I won't always.....) and
say that Masona was given a bit of unwarranted stick. He only put into words what a lot of normal, pragmatic parents feel.
Sorry if this post has jumped all over the place. There were a lot of posts since I last logged on and I would have printed them out but my printer roller is acting up at the moment.
One last point regarding the missing child. If the bizarre theory going around is true (and I agree that things are rarely what they seem) then
wouldn't it have been much, much safer for two medics, with appropriate
connivance from sympathisers, to arrange a heart-attack or something ?
Why would they do it on the world stage ?
Cheers, boys. Off to remove my whalebone corset and support stockings.
Annabel