Provision is not the criterion.
As I said, although that has been suggested (by more than one person), if "re-termination" means to disconnect and then reconnect circuits from their 'terminations' in my CU, then your/their suggestion would mean that when I test my installation, that would be 'notifiable' - which it obviously isn't.If the move can be made without retermination, it would not be notifiable.
In many cases, that would be a perfectly reasonable approach. However, if it were a pretty new board and the only 'non-conformities' were that it is plastic (and didn't have an SPD!) then I'm far less convinced.I guess the other point here... is the cost of a new board is pretty small. Most of the cost is labour on a board swap, and your paying that for moving it all anyway, so why not just fit a nice new compliant up-to-date board in the process?
Glad you agree. As I said, I would personally regard that argument/logic as inescapable.My interpretation lies along the lines of Johns. If you've agreed that retermination is not notifiable (as you need to reterminate for MANY different jobs, and none of these are notifiable) and physically moving the board is not notifiable, then moving and reterminating also isnt notifiable, IMO.
True. However, as you go on to say, there is nothing stopping the customer looking for an electrician whose mind doesn't need changing - so what it actually "comes down to" is whether the dissenting electrician does or does not want/need the work!Ofcourse, it comes down to the spark doing the job, arguing with them if their interpretation differs to your own isnt going to make them change their mind.
Well, for a start, even if "provision of a CU" came into it (which, as EFLI says, it doesn't), I cannot see how an electrician could be said to have "provided" a CU which belonged to the property own and was already there.I'm not disputing there is confusion or lack of detail. ... I'm not saying extending a cable is problematic. ... My statement is: Before; a room without a CU. After; a room witha CU. What part of that doesn't come under provision of a CU?
One clearly can't deduce that. The definition quoted clearly indicates that 'replacing' requires EITHER (a) that something is put back where it always has been OR (b) that something new/different is put in the place of something with has been removed.How do you deduce .... "2, moving something, ie taking it off the wall and putting it back somewhere else" .... form the definition?
Exactly - his/her response would presumably be "What with?"Yes, I thought that as well and agree with you. As you say, were you to ask an electrician to replace the CU, his response would not be "Where to?"?
How do you deduce
"2, moving something, ie taking it off the wall and putting it back somewhere else"
form the definition?
That suggestion, or even the thought of it is just plain simple stupidity if no changes were made to the Electrical device. Other considerations may be required like if the room then became a special place.Well, for a start, even if "provision of a CU" came into it (which, as EFLI says, it doesn't), I cannot see how an electrician could be said to have "provided" a CU which belonged to the property own and was already there.
I really don't think "room without a CU" vs. "room with a CU" is relevant - not the least because I strongly suspect you'd be presenting exactly the same viewpoint (but without being able to argue that it was a different room) if we were talking about moving a CU a substantial distance within the same large room, wouldn't you? ... and, following your 'logic', could knocking down a wall (or building a new one - or even re-purposing a room) mean that the fact that the CU was now 'in a different room' have to be notified?
Kind Regards, John
As you will have seen, neither EFLI nor myself are able to see it like that.As I see it that covers:
2, moving something, ie taking it off the wall and putting it back somewhere else.
I should perhaps have added that the default in legislation is that words have their 'everyday meanings'.... Anyway, no matter what you might find in dictionaries, do you really disagree with me about 'everyday English' ('Common Usage')? If you asked someone to "replace" an extractor fan, tap, boiler, immersion heater, washing machine etc. etc. etc., do you really believe they they would even dream that you were asking for an existing item to be moved to some different location in your house?
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local