Whatever. When counting aerial elements the standard practice is to consider the dipole as ONE of the elements.
 
Sponsored Links
Tell me winston1 if you were ordering a new car, for the sake of the discussion a Ford Fiesta 1.3, would you argue the manufacturer is not reputable?
Certainly not as reputable as for instance Volvo.
 
Is it ? Proof required please.

Whilst the centre of the fold is electrically joined or continuous, there will be a null in voltage at that point from an RF point of view - so it would be fair to consider it in two halves at that point - a dipole. Have you something different in mind?
 
Sponsored Links
Certainly not as reputable as for instance Volvo.


While you're at the order stage for the Fiesta 1.3 would you request a 1.234L (or whatever the actual engine size is [I haven't looked this up])?
No of course you wouldn't as that would be silly, just as silly as asking for a 12 element aerial when the manufacturer calls it a 48 element.
 
While you're at the order stage for the Fiesta 1.3 would you request a 1.234L (or whatever the actual engine size is [I haven't looked this up])?
No of course you wouldn't as that would be silly, just as silly as asking for a 12 element aerial when the manufacturer calls it a 48 element.
A Fiesta 1.3 is a model number not a description whereas 48 element aerial is a misdescription.
 
A Fiesta 1.3 is a model number not a description whereas 48 element aerial is a misdescription.
Now you are making up new rules as you go along.

Fiesta 1.3 is a model description to differentiate it from the Fiesta 1.6 version despite both being factually incorrect.
48 elements is a model description to differentiate it from the 30 element version despite both being factually incorrect.

I don't see how even you can use different rules for those examples.
 
Last edited:
No it is a lie because big numbers sound better to the punters.
The same thing applies to the 1.3, 1.6 etc, such engines are usually smaller than the model number. The number is still incorrect, do you intend to challenge the manufacturers?
 
Volvo - bought from Ford in 2010, now owned by the Chinese Geely Group of companies - proud makers of Proton! :ROFLMAO:
The irony is in #35 my initial draft was going to be: "WTF? you think the Chinese are reputable?" but very annoyingly I managed to remove it while editing an insult.
 
Doesn't 1.3 indicate that the volume of the cylinders is 1.3 litres ?
Supposedly!
Unless you are BMW, who's naming convention is based on 'virtual displacement' and kW outputs :confused:
I.e. an M240i produces 250kW from its 3.0L engine so has a virtual displacement of 4.0L!
...but it does mean PHEV's can still fit into their line up i.e. BMW 745e again has a 3.0L engine.
 
BMW, who's naming convention is based on 'virtual displacement'

Is "virtual displacement" the same as the swept volume (*) and virtually nothing to do with the actual volume of the cylinders.

(*) piston travel times cross section area of cylinder
 

DIYnot Local

Staff member

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top