That's right, because he originally wrote BS7576 (You see, you still aren't reading properly).TraineeSpark said:Well not really BAS, my browser, or whatever it is called says the geezer wrote BS7671. But everyone else quoted him as saying BS 5657 or whatever.
The point to note is that there was an actual quote with that text in, and a total of 3 posts talking about it which were timestamped before the edit that the dazw made to his post.
Surely it must have been obvious what had happened?
But no - you had to tell us that we can't read, when it's you that either can't read, or can't think.
It was all light hearted. If you concentrate really hard and read it all, you'll see that.And even if he did originally use a wrong BS number, before editing post, are we all so far up our own Ars*H*les, that its even worth being interested in?