Not sure I like how this skirting meets the architrave - opinions

[ksunday]

Has anyone seen skirting laid this way before? Not my DIY. Was the builders carpenter son, but I may have to fix it DIY.

 

[RrogerD]

It's a feature to be sure but like you, not sure that I like it. Amongst other things, you're left with that big join running diagonally which needs filling and sanding.

 

[ksunday]

Yeah, I think it looks crap TBH, but I'm trying to be objective as maybe it's just me and I've never seen anything like this before?

 

[aveatry]

It is done like that because your architrave is smaller in depth than the skirt otherwise you will just have a cut off end showing. It could of been done with the join being disguised by the profile

 

[ksunday]

2mm thicker! Surely it’s not just me that finds this odd?

 

[ksunday]

A couple of lengths cut short too.

 

[RrogerD]

Has anyone seen skirting laid this way before? Not my DIY. Was the builders carpenter son, but I may have to fix it DIY.

I suspect that he was shown how to do it at college and is relishing the opportunity at being able to try it out.

 

[aveatry]

this looks to me like they have attempted to do it correctly via scribing and not mitring so its actualy the one on the left that is too short, internal corners are best done with one cut square and the other scribed

 

[ksunday]

Thanks. I’m learning too. I think it’s something that I’ll sleep on and decide if it will drive me nuts or not. A fair bit of effort to change and I really don’t fancy the builder sending his son back round.

 

[aveatry]

As you will be painting it then that big diagonal at the architraves can be sanded and filled but I do think what they were trying to acheive was the right way. Or a shallow bevel from the architrave away may of worked or better yet new architrave in a tourus profile to match the depth of the skirting with then no need for the fancy bit.