Go easy, sammis just ignorant.
yes
as he admitted earler:
I have no idea.
Go easy, sammis just ignorant.
I have no idea.
Only in your head.Wrong.
I say restricting access to guns won't stop mass murder and laws preventing ownership won't stop criminals.
Are those figures gun related murders Sammy? Just says rate of homicide.
Do you therefore claim we should have none?
Only in your head.
Ban guns. No more guns. Stop mass shootings.
But it does matter - as I've said, guns make it easy. If that opportunity is taken away, no, of course it won't stop all murders, but it most deffo stop a lot.It shouldn't matter if they are or aren't. My point is banning guns won't stop mass murder.
Even by the rate of homicide using guns however, the USA doesn't come out on top. It's El Salvador.
So is the USA second?
So what?But not mass murder as I've repeatedly said.
In my country, cars are required by law to have brakes that work.
Sammy says that doesn't stop all fatal accidents.
he doesn't agree that cars in other countries would have fewer fatal accidents if their cars required to be fitted with brakes.
He refuses to admit the vast difference in road deaths between my country, and a country where cars are not required to be fitted with brakes.
In my country, cars are required by law to have brakes that work.
Sammy says that doesn't stop all fatal accidents.
he doesn't agree that cars in other countries would have fewer fatal accidents if their cars required to be fitted with brakes.
He refuses to admit the vast difference in road deaths between my country, and a country where cars are not required to be fitted with brakes.
What is your problem with banning guns and preventing mass shootings that are all too common, for example, in the USA? Is saving lives from terrorist mass shootings not high on your list?