oh dear musnt offend the fashion police

[Mustapha]

Killing anyone during the commissionn of a crime is murder, usually, however to prove murder the Crown must show that the driver set out to intentionally kill the people they ran over, into or whatever that resulted in their deaths.

As a result it is usual for the charge to be one of Death by reckless driving, a charge that can carry up to 14 years, however in my personal opinion the CPS should charge them with Manslaughter, as this give the Judge the discretion to hand out a life sentence. It would be unlikely that this would be given, but the Judge can give it with a low rec, thus in, say, 10 years they could be released, but they would be on parole for life, then should they even shop lift they would automatically be returned to prison without a court case.

In my opinion the Judiciary do not make enough use of the weapons at their disposal within the framework of the law, and the CPS seem reluctant to charge people with offences in a way that reflects their actions during the crime they commit.

 

[Freddie]

Whats up???

 

[Freddie]

Killing anyone during the commissionn of a crime is murder, usually, however to prove murder the Crown must show that the driver set out to intentionally kill the people they ran over, into or whatever that resulted in their deaths.

As a result it is usual for the charge to be one of Death by reckless driving, a charge that can carry up to 14 years, however in my personal opinion the CPS should charge them with Manslaughter, as this give the Judge the discretion to hand out a life sentence. It would be unlikely that this would be given, but the Judge can give it with a low rec, thus in, say, 10 years they could be released, but they would be on parole for life, then should they even shop lift they would automatically be returned to prison without a court case.

In my opinion the Judiciary do not make enough use of the weapons at their disposal within the framework of the law, and the CPS seem reluctant to charge people with offences in a way that reflects their actions during the crime they commit.

I think the people/scum who did this were 16-17 years old

 

[Big_Spark]

Have i said something to upset you???

 

[Softus]

If you are going to try and emulate softus's replies, at least get some lessons first, then try to be original, otherwise it looks amateurish.

Come now oilman, surely, as close to the knuckle as I sometimes am, is Freddie really in the same ball park as to bear comparison?

 

[Freddie]

If you are going to try and emulate softus's replies, at least get some lessons first, then try to be original, otherwise it looks amateurish.

Come now oilman, surely, as close to the knuckle as I sometimes am, is Freddie really in the same ball park as to bear comparison?

Didnt you know Softus i have now become Slogger AGAIN !!!!!

 

[Softus]

Didnt you know Softus i have now become Slogger AGAIN !!!!!

I didn't know, and, frankly, I don't care.

 

[Freddie]

Didnt you know Softus i have now become Slogger AGAIN !!!!!

I didn't know, and, frankly, I don't care.

Again Softus--Freddie not Frankly

 

[Softus]

Again Softus--Freddie not Frankly

You've gained a point in my estimation there Freddie. Keep going...

 

[kendor]

mustapha, hope you don't mind me asking, are you a muslim?

 

[Thermo]

Mustapha, heres a question i always wanted to aak a defence solicitor but never did. Just take the question as read and tell me what you think you would do. Im not asking to be judgemental, just to see your reply.

Scenario:

You represent your client at a police station who has been arrested for the abduction of a young child. This child has diabetes and needs a regular dose of insulin, otherwise their condition becomes life threatening in a very short period of time. Your client has been arrested for the abduction but refuses to say where the child is, thus putting its life in danger. Whilst consulting with your client he informs you of where the child is. What do you do, or what can you do within your guidelines.

P.S. i totally agree with your comments re cps and the fact they often go for the easy prosecution option rather than trying for a higher charge

 

[kendor]

Freddie, **** you, your an inbred illiterate fool who has no life.

I'll bet if the truth was known your entire life is a fantasy, your probably some dirty little grubby man with a rain mack and a stack of porn videos, and the blisters that accompany them.

I no more care what you think that I do what a worm thinks about tomorrows weather forcast.

You have proved by your own words to be a liar, a charletan and a sick minded racist.

You attack everyone who has an independent thought, and that is because you don't, all your little "quips" you emulate from others here.

It would never surprise me to find out that you and slogger are one and the same as the posting style, spelling errors and gramma are very similar, as was Howie's and Georgie's...and we all know that they and you are the same person.

Instead of posting here, you would be far better advised going to college to get an education.

You are the biggest fool here.

Have i said something to upset you???

Freddie,if you don't know then you are exactly what Big spark called you in the first line of his post

 

[joe-90]

however in my personal opinion the CPS should charge them with Manslaughter, as this give the Judge the discretion to hand out a life sentence.

The CPS will go for the maximum charge they think they can get without the person charged winning an appeal. Ergo, manslaughter is out of the question.

I would have thought a solicitor would realise that.


joe

 

[Thermo]

where did you get that nugget of information from then joe?

 

[joe-90]

where did you get that nugget of information from then joe?

I read it somewhere, I tend to remember nearly everything I've ever read (but I can't remember where).


joe