I
imamartian
Bean, you are pretending not to know.
The thug-in-uniform concealed his identity in advance of making his fatal attack on the annoying old bloke walking home from work
There were a great many witnesses on the street, not all of them were violent, or rioters, or concealed their identity. Some of the witnesses were policemen, and some of them were members of the public.
Some of the public were surprised, and upset, or even shocked, that the police force includes some people who are violent thugs, and others who are prepared not to intervene, or not to see, when a violent assault takes place.
Further reading here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Ian_Tomlinson[/QUOTE]
Thanks for that.
"The video showed Tomlinson being struck on the leg from behind by a police officer wielding an extendable baton, then pushed to the ground by the same officer. It appeared to show no provocation on Tomlinson's part—he was not a protester, and at the time he was struck, the footage showed him walking along with his hands in his pockets"
how ridiculous... coppers don't go out intent on killing !!
"appeared to show no provocation on Tomlinson's part" so what, he might have been caling the officer a complete ****!! you don't see that on vid... in reality, if you see a line of riot police you go the other way... don't try to take them on ffs !! and yeah the righteous police haters amongst you will make hay over this sort of thing, but it's coppers like this putting their life on the line that makes this country different to arab states and i applaud the behaviour of our police !!!!