An impossible question must have an impossible answer. Gedditt yet?
The question is about changes in gravity which CAN happen. Geddit yet?
How soon will a change in gravity effect a neighbouring body? Not an impossible question.
And the answers have been provided. Gravity travels at the speed of light.
Given that the theory of relativity predicts gravity travels at lightspeed also that observations within space seem to support this.
Change the suns gravitational effect on space, how soon would we know about it after the event?
Answer that? To use another idiotic Joeism (he won't!) Geddit yet FFS.
So why did you give such a definitive answer early on then Joey?Your question was about something that CANNOT happen in our universe - ever.
It is an impossible question and as such (according to the laws of science) must have an impossible answer.
Give me an example of an impossible question that has a possible solution (he won't).
Not sure about that, but I can help by telling you precisely what you are talking out ofYou tell me where the sun or your body generates its gravity from and we'll talk.
I'm answering the original question - the reason for the thread.
An impossible question, must by its very nature have an answer that is equally impossible. Therefore, whatever answer you have given so far - is wrong.
I don't know whether gravity travels at light speed or if it travels at all.
You tell me where the sun or your body generates its gravity from and we'll talk.
Here's one: "Do impossible answers imply impossible questions?"Yes he did. He postulated a question that is impossible in this universe and then supposedly proved it with a solution that is possible. It doesn't work like that. Impossible questions must have impossible answers. If you think that's wrong - give an example. (He won't).