Yes your correct, looks like a 'senior colleague' helped make the decision, the Council wrote to my architect:
___________________________
Dear ****,
I’m writing in connection with your application at *********. It concerns the plans you have submitted. Having discussed the application with a senior colleague it is considered that the proposal does not comply with the Council’s Development Management Policies, which states that development proposals should be based on an understanding of local characteristics.
Proposals should preserve or enhance local character and respect the local pattern of development. The surrounding area is predominantly characterised by single family dwellinghouses and the conversion of the existing single family dwellinghouse into self-contained flats would result in the loss of a single family dwelling and introduces a use that does not reflect the prevailing character of the locality. It is noted that No. ******** has been converted into flats. However this was approved in the 1970’s and planning policies have developed significantly since.
...... it is not considered that they form a justifiable reason for more inappropriate development within the area. As such, this application will be recommended for refusal.
__________________________
My architect subsequently withdrew the application, after receiving the above email.
My architect - when asked for his thoughts, seemed really miffed, but simply commented that decisions on this sort of application at our local council can seem quite arbitrary at the best of times.
I queried the Planning Officer who had then recently approved a near identical application just a few doors up the road, he then replied:
_________________________
Dear ****,
Thank you for your email.
Having looked at the application reference number you have provided for no. *******, I note that no formal determination by means of recommendation for approval or refusal was officially made by the Local Planning Authority on the application. Our records indicated that the application was withdrawn at the request of *******.
Whilst I appreciate that you may be disappointed with the outcome of the application, I can only advise that the information given to your agent by the case officer will have been offered in good faith in the belief that the advice was accurate. However, notwithstanding this, it was an informal opinion provided by the officer which bears no legal binding on the Local Planning Authority’s final determination. As the application was never determined it cannot formally be advised on whether that proposal would now be considered acceptable.
Whilst I appreciate the concerns raised by yourself, it must be considered that each application must be considered on its own planning merits. Should you wish to either seek pre-application advice, the Local Authority would be happy to entertain that request. Alternatively, you may wish to submit a further planning application and await its final determination.
Kind Regards
________________________
Not sure if they are 'happy to entertain that request' - as its a private service !, or they are simply more accommodating to my application.
So I just feel pushed from pillar to post on this, and thought throwing a load of money at it, with an architect who has had success (with what ever magic he posses) would get it done, but £8 grand !
Bear in mind there is a gap of at least 12 months between applications, so as you suggest maybe something has changed.