I'm fed up to the back teeth with this belief that having an egalitarian, or, horror or horrors, liberal view of anything is somehow an indication of weakness.notb665 said:Softus said:Hang on a cotton-picking minute - in what way is this political correctness?
It's political correctness because it's a softly softly approach over such a silly thing. I mean, is red really going to "offend" or upset kids? If something's wrong, something's wrong, let's not beat about the bush, so let's put the colour of blood (where our use of red comes from), not some feeble weak-minded 'green'.
You not being offended by something doesn't mean that other people aren't - why can't you get that? If someone has a different epidermis then it really is a reliable sign that they're a different person, and that they're allowed to have different views to you.
If the only view you have is that you don't see what could be offensive about red ink / racist comments / tying up offenders with piano wire / setting fire to Muslims, then you are contributing nothing because that view has already been expressed ad nauseam on these forums, and it was mind-numbingly boring the first time that it appeared.
Having an agressive, inflexible, ill-considered, traditional or right-minded viewpoint isn't strong, like you're implying, it's weak, pathetic and empty.