Politicians don't get to choose which votes they respect

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
When you come up with a single economic fact,,I will

You dont need economics to show the issues......I keep telling you.

Ive posted numerous times the problems with trade that Brexit will create.

What is it you are struggling to understand, do let me know how I can help.
 
So Cummings must be a supporter of a second referendum , testing peoples votes is the only way to inform the politicians then.
 
Sponsored Links
I stand corrected. 37 is more than 50. And you are holding up 5 fingers, Winston.
Rofl ...give over man..Forget the stats as it is way over your head..Out of the electorate who voted,more voted brexit than remain..we win.end of.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Out of the electorate who voted

Yes, that is correct. But Gasbanni said:

I think that's right ....they should fight for the views of their electorate even if they don't agree with them.
They are put in office to represent their electorate are they not.

An MP must represent their electorate. That means ALL OF THEM, not just the ones that voted in a non-binding referendum a few years ago. That is the problem, and this is why so many MPs are not agreeing with Brexit - because MOST of their voters didn't vote for it.

It's democracy. Nothing to do with statistics, its just MPs representing their people and what they want, or don't want in this case.

we win.end of.

Yes, LEAVE won the vote. But that was not a binding vote. Every MP knows that, and so do most of the public. So not "end of".
 
That is a very good point. Only 37% of the electorate wanted to leave the EU. A politician must therefore represent the 63% majority that do not want to leave the EU.

It is so refreshing to see that somebody really understands how democracy works in the UK.

Someone needs to seriously learn how to understand figures. And quick! Just because 37% of the electorate wanted to leave, it does not follow that 63% didn’t but using your dumb logic, 35% wanted to remain so that means 65% wanted to leave. Why aren’t the politicians representing that 65%?
 
Last edited:
d,more voted brexit than remain..we win.end of

MPs represent every person in their constituency.

So if a farmer in Durham county says 'Im going to lose my job', then their MP has duty to decide the best course of action.

They have a duty to act in the best interests of the people not some hairbrained scheme some plumber voted for without any knowledge.
 
QUOTE="Motman, post: 4436877, member: 244085"]Someone needs to seriously learn how to understand figures... your dumb logic[/QUOTE]

You're right. An MP cannot assume what their electorate wants. That's why they talk to them.

And because a more or less equal number of people voted each way, it is up to the politician to do what is best for the whole group. That's what we elect them for.

If you disagree, fine, but we live in a democracy and this is how it works. There are 195 countries in the world, each running their own political system. If you really don't like this one, leave.
 
that was not a binding vote.
Correct,,but it is you who is banging on and on about MPs doing what the people want,,and the majority of the electorate who voted,,,opted for brexit.
 
MPs represent every person in their constituency.

So if a farmer in Durham county says 'Im going to lose my job', then their MP has duty to decide the best course of action.

They have a duty to act in the best interests of the people not some hairbrained scheme some plumber voted for without any knowledge.
Another one who lives in cuckoo land..cannot keep everyone happy..Like it or not, majority of electorate voted out,,MPs go with the majority..Do not be so stupid as to try and run with your waffle
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top