D
durhamplumber
Richmond,N York’s?He also has a superb constituency to be an MP for. I love it there.
Richmond,N York’s?He also has a superb constituency to be an MP for. I love it there.
Richmond,N Yorks?He also has a superb constituency to be an MP for. I love it there.
Debates are fine if everyone understood economics, finance, GDP, Deficits etc. I don't get into debates on what pipe fitting to use but all and sundry have an opinion on complex economics issues. There is no both sides of an argument when one person brings nothing other than their opinion. Should there be both sides of a debate between a flat earther and a astrophysicist?
We don't need both sides of an argument - we just need one set of facts. RWR have a habit of denying facts.
No vaccine as yet has been cleared for use and the AZ vaccine trials have not released their data.
thats an astonishing waste of money when the vaccine is not too far off.
Yes..it is a very scenic area I enjoy cycling in.Yeah. Beautiful.
Talk about trying to argue both sides.....
Its amazing how you talk about the nasty right wing yet you clearly have so much hate and negativity.
While there may only be "one set of facts", there are differing (learned, and valid, depending on the outcomes they're hoping to achieve) opinions on how to manage an economy, in the knowledge of those "facts". That is why are there different schools of economic thought.
You've also subtly twisted the narrative in your post as well - people without economic understanding should not be permitted an opinion on such matters - which is fine.
But that doesn't mean they should be totally divorced from the process either.
Non-economists do not need a working knowledge of economics to know what outcome they want.
I don't tell Joe (who, de temps en temps, fixes my boiler) what to do, beyond "make my heating work please!"
I give him the desired outcome, and he either delivers it within agreed parameters (time, cost, trouble, longevity of solution, etc), or gives me a set of other options to achieve my desired outcome.
I don't need a working knowledge of boiler mechanics (or a Gas Safe registration) to state my "desired outcome".
Edited for typo.
I rest my case.
But the outcome they want is based on their lack of knowledge / understanding.
Or shall we explain the paradox at the heart of capitalism? They all want lower taxes and better services, or no regulation but then complain about poor standards.
Look at all those saying we need a Private Healthcare system like the US - not seeing just how massive waste of resources that is. Then saying they don't want to pay for someone else's treatment - when that is excatly what happens in an Insurance based system - you pool the risk and some get paid out whilst others just contribute. The cognitive dissonance is off the scale.
The outcome people want is their rational choice - what they believe to be in their best interests but the work by Kahnemann has pretty much proven people are easily influenced and distracted so want things that are not in their best interests.