If it was bombed by radical islamists what countries should we bomb and devastate in retaliation "shock and awe" style?
Bradford.
If it was bombed by radical islamists what countries should we bomb and devastate in retaliation "shock and awe" style?
If it was bombed by radical islamists what countries should we bomb and devastate in retaliation "shock and awe" style?
If the chunnel was bombed would it flood?
Lets say a ton of semtex exploded in the middle.
Would the sides rupture outwards or would everything inside the tunnel just be expelled like a giant bazooka?
I could see it being every bit as devastating as the attack on the twin towers.
Factoring in the elimination of checking in and and baggage reclamation.
For an explosion in the Channel tunnel to allow sea water to enter, it would have to explode through the tunnel walls and about 40 -60 metres of rock above. So I doubt very much whether the channel tunnel could be flooded by a bomb.
Even if it didn't - terror causes fear. Fear stops people traveling through it. No point running it without passengers.
My wife
My wife
You missed a word out here, JB!!
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/japans-maglev-train-breaks-world-speed-record-122534223.html#TdpwIyx
Travelling at 350+mph. more comfortable than planes, possibly more fuel efficient. Less prone to terrorist hijacks?
Factoring in the elimination of checking in and and baggage reclamation, it could be that for overland journeys this may well (and ought?) to be the way to go.
Flying overseas will still be necessary though.
If it was bombed by radical islamists what countries should we bomb and devastate in retaliation "shock and awe" style?
Bradford.