my responses in green to points shown
My perspective is that even after the system has been cleaned, there is always old sediment remaining, and the magnaclean will trap any circulating black. So I like the idea of leaving X400 in once the sytem has been returned to service, to encourage the loosening and collection of this residue.
...This business of you quoting the fact that Sentinel have said this "now" makes it sound as though they have removed some previously imposed time limit...
Sentinel now say (and I only saw this recently, the only advice I had previously seen was to drain it out) "There is no limit to the time for which the product can safely be left in the system." see http://www.sentinel-solutions.net/en/heating/X400/application
I can't find any suggestion from anyone, including me, that contradicts this....and there is no suggestion that it should be a substitute for inhibitor.
you said earlier "No, it can't, because it won't stop the ferrous components from corroding." which would only be true if the system was left without inhibitor, which I have not suggested.
...To reiterate: the longer you leave the X400 in, the less effect it has, and the longer you leave the sediment in, the more time it has to re-coagulate, and the longer you leave the system without an inhibitor, the more time it has to corrode...
I only see an advantage in leaving it in if you have a device to remove the sediment. If removed, it is not going to re-coagulate.
I have not suggested leaving the system without an inhibitor
However I do see an advantage in leaving it in after the system seems clean, because it seems that it will continue loosening some of the residue which will then be trapped and can be removed .
My perspective is that even after the system has been cleaned, there is always old sediment remaining, and the magnaclean will trap any circulating black. So I like the idea of leaving X400 in once the sytem has been returned to service, to encourage the loosening and collection of this residue.