That's not a convincing excuse for Israel's destruction of Palestine.
Accused of genocide but in need of further investigation and not by Starmer. The ICC are the people who get to decide on that.Is he ignoring genocide ?
Christ! 4000 women and nearly 8000 kids?
Barbaric.
The fella is a nutter if he thinks the killing is ok.
Almost a cause to celebrate
For some anyway
I suppose by killing the children, filly thinks they are neutralising the potential, thus deterring future terrorists.
Straight from the Nazism handbook.
I don't think that makes it ok. It doesn't have to be one or the other, Hamas were wrong in what they did but Israel have been even worse.
Silly Andy loves to claim that anyone who objects to racism, apartheid and genocide must be anti-Jewish.
His claim is obviously nonsense.
Talk about missing the point. Not really something to celebrate, is it.Any war is tragic, and in any war there will be civilian casualties.
It will be several years before the true casualty rate is established in Gaza, it will be lower, by how much no-one knows, but it will be lower. Already the figures are being modified after analysis by 'experts' found that some of the figures are plainly wrong and not possible.
The best estimates taking both sides figures into account say that for every 3 deaths, 2 were civilians, that puts the civilian death rate at 66%, which is awful. In the Iraq war the civilian death ratio was 77%,, that was the UK and USA btw.
In the Kosovo war (UK and USA under NATO), it;s more clouded, if Nato figures are to be believed, the civilian death ratio was almost zero, if the Yugoslavian figures are to be believed (and they were the ones being bombed by the Americans), the ratio is several times higher than Gaza. In the Syrian civil war, almost 800,000 people have been killed, not many of them were soldiers.
But hey guys, if these civvys aren't being killed by Jews, that's ok, isn't it?
Hitler's supporters no doubt said the same the same thing. Gaza has been reduced to rubble in an attempt to destroy Hamas, which they will never do.Any war is tragic, and in any war there will be civilian casualties.
Rubbish any figure anybody comes up with can not compete with a true body count. External people can only come up with some theory or the other and for a variety of reasons it's likely to be biased one way or another. The US estimate is rather a lot higher of late than it used to be and determining the number of HAMAS killed is also rather tricky. The number of battalions in Rafar has gone up. I wonder why. If it really has that in itself is an interesting factor.It will be several years before the true casualty rate is established in Gaza, it will be lower, by how much no-one knows, but it will be lower. Already the figures are being modified after analysis by 'experts' found that some of the figures are plainly wrong and not possible.
What they have done is hardened the minds of more.Hitler's supporters no doubt said the same the same thing. Gaza has been reduced to rubble in an attempt to destroy Hamas, which they will never do.
Would you have liked Israel to just brush it off?What they have done is hardened the minds of more.
If you lost innocent members of your family in the way many have you wouldn't just brush it off. The anger and sorrow will build and fester.
No.Would you have liked Israel to just brush it off?
I have posted plenty, but you refuse to look at them.Can you point out examples of this 'racism, apartheid and genocide' that you refer to?
Filly wont do that. He sticks to one particular meaning of the word and legally the law has others.I have posted plenty, but you refuse to look at them.
You are a troll hoping to trick me into wasting more time on you.
You can look at South Africa's submissions if you want to see thorough evidence.