Problems in the NHS

https://www.theguardian.com/society...s-increase-crumbling-system-new-norm#comments

Nationally, the GP workforce has shrunk by 3.7% since 2015, with a further drop in GP partner figures of 16%, at a time when the registered patient population is rising to 60.2 million.

We are also having to deal with the fallout from early or failed hospital discharges, where patients need to be followed up to discuss or arrange tests and initiate new medications – sometimes with scant information as we await discharge letters.

Last year thousands of people did not see a specialist within the NHS target of two weeks of an urgent cancer referral, and one in eight are waiting more than 18 weeks for a routine appointment. This leads to repeat GP appointments, requests for home visits, and increased paperwork trying to expedite referrals and arrange more tests.

It is not uncommon for a patient to need an appointment the day, or day after, they are discharged to manage an urgent issue that could not be dealt with while an inpatient. This inevitably means that many patients who are still sick end up being readmitted to hospital for an acute condition such as ongoing severe infection, breathlessness or dehydration.

Many of these revolving-door patients are frail and elderly or have got dementia, and are not receiving support in the community due to social care budgets being stripped to the bone. In a health system that depends on all services linking together, it is perhaps not surprising that we are seeing the NHS crumbling.

No wonder they are leaving the profession. But RWR on here know better.
 
Sponsored Links
:rolleyes: don't forget the waiting list of 13000 waiting to see a specialist about gender change ;)

The NHS is failing them ;)
 
Sponsored Links
A lot of people go abroad for private cosmetic surgery

In many cases the NHS ends up. Picking up the tab when the ops go wrong or complications arise after they come back to the UK
 
Ah, fair enough if cause pain I guess.
I wonder who decides though, what is important and what isn't.
NICE effectively.

There's a formula that says that a year of life is worth X pounds. A treatment that will on average extend someone's life for less than that amount is ok, one that costs more is not.

There's a huge amount of complexity behind it, a drug or treatment that keeps you alive for a year but leaves you bedridden is less valuable than one that keeps you in perfect health. And cancer drugs basically get a bigger budget because it goes down well politically.

The exact breakdown of where spending goes, e.g. to surgeons or shrinks or nurses is slightly different. That's a mixture of CCGs, NHSI, NHSE, government targets and Trust policies.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top