I have a Drayton Digistat+3 programmer and I notice that it is designed to reach the desired room temperature by a very gradual process, and I wonder if that's a good thing.
As an example, suppose that the room temperature is 16 degrees and thermostat is set to 20 degrees. The programmer calls for the boiler to supply heat, which it does and all is good.
Now, when the temperature reaches about 18.5 - 19 degrees, the programmer will deactivate the call to the boiler, and the boiler will duly shut off, even though we are still short of the desired 20 degrees.
After perhaps 5 minutes or so, the programmer will again call for heat, this time for a shorter interval before then stopping the call. And repeat and repeat, with the boiler off intervals getting longer and the boiler on intervals getting shorter as the temperature gradually moves towards 20 degrees.
I wonder if this constant cycling is good for the longevity of the boiler? Is it energy efficient? Am I reasonable in wondering why the heating shuts off even though we're still so far from the target temperature?
As an example, suppose that the room temperature is 16 degrees and thermostat is set to 20 degrees. The programmer calls for the boiler to supply heat, which it does and all is good.
Now, when the temperature reaches about 18.5 - 19 degrees, the programmer will deactivate the call to the boiler, and the boiler will duly shut off, even though we are still short of the desired 20 degrees.
After perhaps 5 minutes or so, the programmer will again call for heat, this time for a shorter interval before then stopping the call. And repeat and repeat, with the boiler off intervals getting longer and the boiler on intervals getting shorter as the temperature gradually moves towards 20 degrees.
I wonder if this constant cycling is good for the longevity of the boiler? Is it energy efficient? Am I reasonable in wondering why the heating shuts off even though we're still so far from the target temperature?