masona said:I used to work mostly for well-off people and to get paid by them is like blood out of a stone.
Well, it works both ways. Has anyone else seen the documentaries with interviews with real-life tradesmen, many of them admitting to quoting more if the customer appeared "posh"? I am not sure how many tradesmen do this, but it is probably just as many as the well-off people who don't pay.
Now, obviously there are a lot of good tradesmen out there, but there are also some appalling ones. My parents hired in a kitchen fitter. He gave a quote, estimated somewhere around two weeks work. He then did what can only be described as a mediocre job, didn't finish (cabinets not all installed, no tiling done). Now, he had decided that it would take him two weeks, quoted two weeks, but when he got halfway through week three he decided "They're not paying me enough, I'm off". They hadn't changed the spec, they got up and went out to work every morning before he arrived, came home after he left, were available by phone to answer any questions. He still expected full payment. Whatsmore, my parents paid him the full amount because they couldn't be bothered with the hassle
Now, if some private company is doing work for the government, quotes £500M to do a job, decides it has underquoted and then demands £1bn, everyone feels outraged. In fact, the system now used for most government contracts does not allow this. So why should it be allowed elsewhere?