While waiting for our appeals outcome from Planning Inspectorate we submitted CLD application with fall back plans showing the garage detached from the approved extension. However after initially validating the plans council now requesting to submit existing plans or they will invalidate the application even though it's an incomplete structure.
By now I know my council and their evil representatives trying to make scores for personal career progression. I requested our town planner to make it clear for the case worker to assess the application as submitted.
Today I find following information and this confirms council ill intentions to refuse our CLD which will have an impact on our appeal and any future enforcement.
"When an extension to a dwelling is detached from it to create a separate structure, it is not possible to claim Class E permitted development rights for the resulting outbuilding, as demonstrated in Hillingdon 09/01/2012 DCS No 400-001-448. In upholding an enforcement notice requiring the removal of an outbuilding in the rear garden of a dwelling in Middlesex an inspector decided that the appellant could not benefit from permitted development rights under Class E of Part 1 to Schedule 2 of the GPDO. The appellant had erected the building which formed an extension to the property and then, as a separate operation, undertook further works which created a standalone garage. The inspector concluded that as two separate building operations had occurred and since only the original could benefit from permitted development rights, the creation of a separate building by demolishing part of the original structure could not benefit from permitted development rights under Class E."
We are not professional builders and as layman done everything in our power before reforming first ever property to suit our needs. I don't want to be negative but this is a nightmare for us and don't know when this all will end.
So, you built a big extension under PD, the council enforced based on it not being PD, you submitted a full pplication which was refused based on it breaching planning policy, so you appealed the refusal and submitted a LDC application at the same time (which is not always a good idea) based on a fall back (ie a reason why the council should have approved it) but the council are saying that the fall back does not apply because the fall back would not be PD in the first place?
That seems a correct decision from the council.
If the original work was not PD, and if it breaches planning policy, and you can't achieve the same thing under PD rights, then any appeal must fail.