OK. What was the fault?Yes it was.What does "a bit dodgy" mean, exactly? Was the switch faulty or not?
So you're about to make a third change without diagnosing the original fault.Overnight have decided to replace the suspect cable with a new run.
Yes - you haven't diagnosed the fault yet.Is there any reason why i should't simply run the cable through a dry bathroom to the shower from the isolation switch as a temp measure to see if its the shower at fault?
Your logic is flawed....with the view that if the tripping continues must be the new shower, so replace that...
Of course people thought it was for a reason. It's just the reason is still a mystery. However, you replaced the switch without having a reason to.So i didn't explicitly say the old shower was faulty, my mistake, i assumed the most people would realise someone swapping one item for an identical one, does so for a reason.
You don't yet know whether you removed a cause of tripping and introduced a new, and different, cause of tripping. Until you know what the fault is it's very foolish to claim to know what the problem isn't.I didn't introduce a fault, i simply removed some others, and made an existing one worse.
That's not logic, it's wishful thinking.So my logic says, new shower, new switch chances that they faulty is much less likely than then chance the existing cable is faulty.
Don't assume anything.I assume that as i had to grapple with the cable to move it about a bit to fit the new shower (same model but moved the location of inputs ) , that any existing insulation problem (a live/neutral to-earth ) in the cable which was causing the old intermittent problem was made worse due to the movement of cable and now have a permanent something to-earth problem within the cable.