C
cantaloup63
Agreed - it was a good goad too. But enough is enough joeI believe this is just a thread to goad members here.
About time the Mods stopped it.
Agreed - it was a good goad too. But enough is enough joeI believe this is just a thread to goad members here.
About time the Mods stopped it.
I believe this is just a thread to goad members here.
About time the Mods stopped it.
It may be less too - that's what estimates are. It could be £1.75I gave you the link. It may be MORE than £300 million. .
No-one is forcing you to read or contribute to the thread. If you don't like it - you know where the door is.
Not any more, some rioting chav burnt it down.No-one is forcing you to read or contribute to the thread. If you don't like it - you know where the door is.
It may be less too - that's what estimates are. It could be £1.75I gave you the link. It may be MORE than £300 million. .
Not any more, some rioting chav burnt it down.No-one is forcing you to read or contribute to the thread. If you don't like it - you know where the door is.
Nice try Try reading some more intellectual papers, like the mirror or somethingSo none of you can even begin to dream where the £300 million will go. I guess I won this one then?
Agreed - it was a good goad too. But enough is enough joeI believe this is just a thread to goad members here.
About time the Mods stopped it.
Nope, and more to the point nor do youIt may be less too - that's what estimates are. It could be £1.75I gave you the link. It may be MORE than £300 million. .
If it's all so wrong - why are you arguing about it? You don't really have a clue do you?
I've always said that they are purely unsubstantiated estimates and that your simplistic calculation is flawed on all levels. It it you who is using a random number to prove a point.So you've argued for 5 pages that the figures are right - now you say they are wrong. Go to bed.