Yes that is pretty much how I interpreted it, but that's just dumb as you would then need to drain it and take on all the risks associated with such a poor design like what happens if the drain blocks up and having to take rainwater back inside the roof as well as having to make upstands or bizarre falls which will presumably will not help the OP to 'have 4M high clearance to get my beloved pitched at the sides' whatever the hell that means. Therefore I took it for granted that the OP was not as thick as two short planks, forgot to pay his brain bill, the lights are on but nobody's home or is a few cards short of a deck but is in fact just illiterate and meant something else.FMT, I believe he's asking us whether his roof design (which we've never seen) can be altered so that it has a dip, depression or is in some way lower in the region where he plans to install the lantern, such that the lantern is within the 4m limit. To me, that's called a rooflight, albeit a strangely shaped onet