Uhm, you have a gigantic logic failure there. To begin with, why would that be directed at me?
IHNI - I didn't write it.
You should ask that question of geraint, since he did direct it at you.
With no quote of an earlier post by another person there is no workable way to interpret any post as anything other than a response to the one immediately before it. Expecting people to divine that without some reference to something else a post relates to anything other than the one immediately before it is crazy - there's no way that people could keep track of what's going on.
You really would have to be spectacularly stupid to have been a member of a forum for years, and to have made hundreds of posts, and not grasped that.
On top of that, "if you happen to have missed the warning tape" is a direct quote of ColJack a few posts higher.
There was no use of [quote] [/quote] brackets, or any other recognised method of indicating a quote, so it wasn't one, or at least it wasn't one that worked.
Someone really would have to be spectacularly stupid to have been a member of a forum for years, and to have made hundreds of posts, and not worked out how to create quotes which were recognisable as such.
Just because it came after my post, doesn't mean it was in response to it or directed at me.
With no quote of an earlier post by another person there is no workable way to interpret any post as anything other than a response to the one immediately before it. Expecting people to divine that without some reference to something else a post relates to anything other than the one immediately before it is crazy - there's no way that people could keep track of what's going on.
Any poster who had been a member for years and had made hundreds of posts, and who wanted to reply to something other than the immediately preceding one really would have to be spectacularly stupid not to have grasped that.