Sentencing (criminal justice system)
- Thread starter diy_fun_uk
- Start date
Sponsored Links
1
A
These are the current guidelines
https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/offences/magistrates-court/item/sexual-activity-with-a-child/
A
These are the current guidelines
https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/offences/magistrates-court/item/sexual-activity-with-a-child/
Seriously, do you think that such thing can happen today with technology following our every move.
Accordingly to you I would be able to speak/text/meet someone, invite them to my home to kill them and leave no trace of this.
You're deluded.
You take no responsibility for any of your actions.
Giving you a vote is (proven) to be dangerous.
Sponsored Links
By definition (unless you want a degree of criminality), the presence of any crime demonstrates that it is not "under control".
There were times when it was under much better control. Maybe you can remember a time when it wasn't normal for hood rats to roam the streets of London, killing each other and anyone who gets in the way. Now it's so common, it's not even noteworthy.
I remember a government minister being interviewed years back and they were discussing house break-ins. The minister was asked what we should do if we are confronted by someone in our own home. They replied along these lines:
In a forceful voice, shout 'be off with you!'
I remember thinking yeah, that'll work (not.) Do any of you remember those giant spring things with a handle each end used for exercising? Premise bend the spring to strengthen muscle. I keep one of those beside my bed. Should anyone enter my house without an invite they'll be introduced to it
In a forceful voice, shout 'be off with you!'
I remember thinking yeah, that'll work (not.) Do any of you remember those giant spring things with a handle each end used for exercising? Premise bend the spring to strengthen muscle. I keep one of those beside my bed. Should anyone enter my house without an invite they'll be introduced to it
Even if it’s not a 'good deterrent', if you lock a burglar up for a long time, that’s a long time they won’t be out burgling people. It’s protecting society from them isn’t it?
Whilst there's no doubt an element of truth in this, I feel things have swung too far the other way in some cases. I would assert just because longer sentences don't necessarily deter doesn't mean they shouldn't be applied. At present, many victims of crime aren't receiving justice.
The Yorkshire Ripper police investigation was a shambles.
Two of the leading officers had been promoted after achieving high-profile convictions, gaining fame and reputation.
It was later discovered that this had been done by suppressing and falsifying evidence and confessions.
Had they been competent, results might have been better.
They could hardly have been worse.
Two of the leading officers had been promoted after achieving high-profile convictions, gaining fame and reputation.
It was later discovered that this had been done by suppressing and falsifying evidence and confessions.
Had they been competent, results might have been better.
They could hardly have been worse.
T
teaboyjim
Did they end up putting innocent people in jug or did they target people they new were guilty but didn't have enough evidence
Last edited by a moderator:
T
teaboyjim
So it went further than bending rules
Last edited by a moderator:
T
teaboyjim
That sounds from a more peaceful and less violent time
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsored Links
