Should people who refuse a Covid vaccine be denied treatment or charged for it?

[Brigadier]

Kindly repeat this explanation, because I can't find it.
All I can find are simple assertions: "No, he, hasn't. You have misunderstood / misrepresented RnC's post, which is why you think it is "extremely fallible".

That won't pass as an explanation. What/how have I misunderstood? What/how have I misrepresented? How does my misunderstanding or misrepresenting (if there is any) demonstrate that his argument is not infallible?

You're just flanneling because that's all you've got.

No, you just chose to quote everything bar the explanation (which you claimed - falsely - was absent: an SOP for the trolling poster, hoping to paint a distortion of the thread to the skim - reader.

 

[Scarlet Pimpernel]

Is your post meant to be a question?

Good God! It's like trying to discuss Einstein's Theory of relativity with a one year old who's more concerned with his own bodily functions!
Just address the question instead of getting bogged down in the minutia of an absent grammatical punctuation mark?

No, you just chose to quote everything bar the explanation (which you claimed - falsely - was absent: an SOP for the trolling poster, hoping to paint a distortion of the thread to the skim - reader.

If I had provided an explanation, and someone claimed I hadn't, I'd repeat it, (it's only a simple matter of copying and pasting, assuming it ever existed).
If they still claimed I hadn't provided such an explanation, I'd repost it, in bold, in a highlighted colour. If they still claimed I had't provided an explanation, I'd repost yet again, this time in bright, bold capital letters, and in larger font.
I wouldn't keep hopping and skipping around, hoping I could flannel my way through.

So repost this supposed explanation that you claim you have provided, because I can't find it, unsurprisingly because it does not exist. Otherwise I'm going to consider sending in your name for Strictly, because you're definitely practicing the ducking, diving, bobbing, weaving and swerving.

 

[Brigadier]

Good God! It's like trying to discuss Einstein's Theory of relativity with a one year old who's more concerned with his own bodily functions!

Ad hominem, when you have no point, and are

......hoping I could flannel my way through.

Just address the question ........

Do you have fantasies about being in the Stasi, or the Gestapo?
And, if we're giving out the orders, "Just stay banned"

If I had provided an explanation, and someone claimed I hadn't, I'd repeat it, (it's only a simple matter of copying and pasting, assuming it ever existed).

It was only a matter of you simply "copying and pasting" my relevant post but, as you actively chose to edit out the explanation, I know you're just trolling.

If they still claimed I hadn't provided such an explanation, I'd repost it, in bold, in a highlighted colour. If they still claimed I had't provided an explanation, I'd repost yet again, this time in bright, bold capital letters, and in larger font.
I wouldn't keep hopping and skipping around, hoping I could flannel my way through.

It was only a matter of you simply "copying and pasting" my relevant post but, as you actively chose to edit out the explanation, I know you're just trolling.

So repost this supposed explanation that you claim you have provided, because I can't find it, unsurprisingly because it does not exist.

Well, as you actively chose to copy and paste the rest of my post around it, but actively also chose to omit it, I know you are also lying too.

Otherwise I'm going to consider sending in your name for Strictly, because you're definitely practicing the ducking, diving, bobbing, weaving and swerving.

Knock yourself out. Do let me know how you get on.

 

[Scarlet Pimpernel]

It was only a matter of you simply "copying and pasting" my relevant post but, as you actively chose to edit out the explanation, I know you're just trolling.

It was only a matter of you simply "copying and pasting" my relevant post but, as you actively chose to edit out the explanation, I know you're just trolling.


Well, as you actively chose to copy and paste the rest of my post around it, but actively also chose to omit it, I know you are also lying too.

Did you see what you did there:

........... hoping I could flannel my way through.

Typical of your hopping, skipping and weaving to include an observation that ranks of hypocrisy.

There's a saying about trying, and if you don't succeed on your first attempt, try again.
In your case, as it's your umpteenth time of trying, you should give up and stop making a complete fool of yourself.

And did you see what you did there also:

Ad hominem, when you have no point, .........

Do you have fantasies about being in the Stasi, or the Gestapo?
And, if we're giving out the orders, "Just stay banned"

You accuse me of using ad hominem attacks, then repeat the very thing that you've just accused me of doing.

You really are making a complete fool of yourself.

 

[Brigadier]

Did you see what you did there:

Typical of your hopping, skipping and weaving to include an observation that ranks of hypocrisy.

There's a saying about trying, and if you don't succeed on your first attempt, try again.
In your case, as it's your umpteenth time of trying, you should give up and stop making a complete fool of yourself.

And did you see what you did there also:

You accuse me of using ad hominem attacks, then repeat the very thing that you've just accused me of doing.

You really are making a complete fool of yourself.

Meh.

 

[Scarlet Pimpernel]

Meh.

Better late than never.

 

[pete50]

Hooray another worthless thread about to get locked. What a bunch of clowns you all are.

 

[Brigadier]

Hooray another worthless thread about to get locked. What a bunch of clowns you all are.

If it's worthless, it won't matter.

 

[charliegolf]

If it's worthless, it won't matter.

Except, Brig, some threads have a start line worth chatting about/debating. Five or 6 trolls fusk them all up. Like this one. Do you disagree?

 

[Brigadier]

Except, Brig, some threads have a start line worth chatting about/debating. Five or 6 trolls fusk them all up. Like this one. Do you disagree?

Try Pete; he thought the thread worthless.

 

[charliegolf]

I'm asking you.

 

[fillyboy]

I'm asking you.

It was Pete wot said it, why ask Brig to justify something wot Pete said?

 

[Brigadier]

I'm asking you.

Where were you when the usual suspects contaminated it with Brexit bollogs again, for page after page?

 

[IT Minion]

The mods might be nice enough to delete the last few pages. Otherwise it's probably served its purpose, all good things come to an ignominious end, just like our membership of the EU.

 

[charliegolf]

Brig said, "If it's worthless, it won't matter." My position is that it does matter, that every thread is dragged into the basement by the same 5 or 6 people. I'm asking Brig if he really does think it doesn't matter.

Edit: About the usual suspects, they: 1 Usually talk ****e, 2 Don't know what matters in debate, 3 Don't care.

I sensed you did.