Once the decision had been taken; assault would not be considered a problem.
I think forcing an individual to have an injection would be morally and ethically wrong.
How do you think trying to vaccinate the anti-vaxxers on here would go........
Once the decision had been taken; assault would not be considered a problem.
So - - - - you are implying that no government would do such a thing?I think forcing an individual to have an injection would be morally and ethically wrong.
A bit like beating up an old defenceless anti-lockdown protester, I suppose.How do you think trying to vaccinate the anti-vaxxers on here would go........
That is a moot point, as it could be considered as an assault.
He went out into his garden, well, small holding, and within 5 minutes had a phone call asking him why he left home.
How difficult would that be to counterfeit ? Marking law abiding people out as being different has been tried before, how long before someone suggests people who don't want a vaccine have to wear an arm band with some sort of symbol, possibly a star, and colour it, blue perhaps?I am perhaps though in fav of a vax passport!
I find people's acquiescence very worrying.
I am astounded how easily you lot accept everything you are told.
Masks, lockdown, home schooling, distancing, no sitting down for food and drink, no bingo, no visits to dying parents locked in lagers (aka care homes), no work, no relatives' visits, no sport, no birthdays, no weddings, no events, no haircuts, no manicure, no pedicure, no massage of any kind...What acquiescence? Having a vaccine? Not sure what you mean, cos it's very clear that no-one need acquiesce to anything vaccine wise.
What are we accepting? On this occasion.
we knowTrace doesn't work