This issue is about the divorce payment!
Gosh really. And in what document would you find the legal requirement or otherwise for a divorce payment
Obviously you havent read it.
I suggest you do, before making yourself look......er whats that word?
This issue is about the divorce payment!
what nonsense.
Although another interpretation might be that Theresa said "I have a majority, but I need a bigger one. Give me a bigger majority and I will deliver my fantasy Brexit"
And the voters said "No."
So now she has to deliver a soft-soft-hard-soft-ish Brexit - as that is the only one she can get support for. Either way, she lays it out the MPs vote, the lords protest, the MP tell them where to go and its job done. If I recall, it was the matching cardigan party that said they would not leave the EU and while they did better than before, people still said "no".
****!Gosh really. And in what document would you find the legal requirement or otherwise for a divorce payment
Obviously you havent read it.
I suggest you do, before making yourself look......er whats that word?
http://www.lisbon-treaty.org/wcm/th.../title-6-final-provisions/137-article-50.htmlIn the light of the guidelines provided by the European Council, the Union shall negotiate and conclude an agreement with that State, setting out the arrangements for its withdrawal, taking account of the framework for its future relationship with the Union. That agreement shall be negotiated in accordance with Article 218(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Nonsense!The only way out of brexit?
EU offer the crappiest of crap deals. Govt table a walk not sign option, someone tables an amendment to cancel article 50. MPs vote it through, cos nobody knows what the people want anymore. EU rub their hands and say sure - welcome back. Job done.
http://www.lisbon-treaty.org/wcm/th.../title-6-final-provisions/137-article-50.html3. The Treaties shall cease to apply to the State in question from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification referred to in paragraph 2, unless the European Council, in agreement with the Member State concerned, unanimously decides to extend this period.
5. If a State which has withdrawn from the Union asks to rejoin, its request shall be subject to the procedure referred to in Article 49.
http://www.lisbon-treaty.org/wcm/th.../title-6-final-provisions/137-article-50.html4. For the purposes of paragraphs 2 and 3, the member of the European Council or of the Council representing the withdrawing Member State shall not participate in the discussions of the European Council or Council or in decisions concerning it.
Free trade amongst its members is hardly crappy.EU offer the crappiest of crap deals.
It does not matter, there is probably no way back other than a new application to rejoin. Unless the EU amend the Treaty to allow the cancellation of an Article 50 notice.Free trade amongst its members is hardly crappy.
Nonsense!
The EU alone cannot make such a decision. Only the EU Council and the 27 other members can make such a decision, and it has to be unanimous!
Although the Lisbon Treaty does not make allowance for a cancellation of an Article 50 notice, It only makes provision for a delay of the same.
It does not matter, there is probably no way back other than a new application to rejoin. Unless the EU amend the Treaty to allow the cancellation of an Article 50 notice.
That was exactly what I said earlier:The only word you should have highlighted is negotiate. The text does not support any argument that there is an agreed bill for leaving the EU. It clearly states the parties attempt to negotiate a new arrangement and if they fail we leave in 2 years with neither party having any obligation to the other.
Remember : Nothing is agreed until everything is agreed. The agreement on the divorce payment was to open the door on a trade etc. deal. If that is not agreed then nothing is agreed.
The withdrawal has been agreed and it includes a divorce payment. It does not matter if it was not in the Article 50 part of the Lisbon Treaty, nor in the Holy Bible, the common prayer book, Enid Blyton's Famous Five books, nor anywhere else. it has been agreed!
Now if the UK wants an orderly withdrawal it will honour its agreement. Anything else is a disorderly withdrawal.
Has the EU agreed that? Have the other member states agreed that?On the subject of avoiding Brexit - I gave one possible way it could happen. the EU have already said they would be happy for the UK to change their mind subject to agreement with the 27 and most of those have already said they are ok with it. Article 50, is silent on cancellation rights... It only describes the process for rejoining at the end of the period.
This is not contract law. It is a Treaty.In Contract law, if something is non-cancellable or perpetual, it is normal to say so. All we have is the various speeches..
I have not seen any official response on this issue either from EU or the other members.There seems to be a lot of harmony on the desire for us to come back during the period or after.