hermes said:Why can't they be compared? They are both contributing to the possibility of disease in later life.gcol said:Yeah i'm sure it is!!!!!!! Stupid comment dude. Did no one teach you to think before you speak? The two cannot possibly be compared.Pensdown said:Of course smoking near small children is stupid, it's as bad as taking them to fast food places and letting them stuff their little faces with all sorts of rubbish.
They can't be compared because eating fast food is their own choice - breathing the 2nd hand smoke in the home isn't their choosing.
Pensdown
"Why not. If you look at the physical state of a lot of young people, they are well over weight, they eat far to much fat & salt and never exercise."
Yes I agree there seems to be a few more fat kids these days, but the point is that you can't justify smoking just because there are a few other things that are bad for us.
The whole point of this smoking ban is to protect non smokers in public places - they have a right to go where they want in a public place and not be poisoned. The smoking in the home issue has nothing to do with this ban. It will and always has been down to the parent whether they decide to poison their own child in the comfort of their own homes.
What I cannot accept is that I should be poisoned whilst having a few pints in the pub to save smokers kids from breathing in the filth that I have been breathing in. I think that's a non-argument.