So the EU wanna play hardball ? Stuff em

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

My comment was to your reference that you learned something about Woody long ago, yet you only joined the forum 9 months ago, according to the site.
Which bit is a lie? Perhaps you were referring to one of your previous incarnations?

Ah bless! Do I really need to explain the concept of 'long ago' as a relative term?
I could do, and in doing so, explain how Woody makes unfounded allegations, then when requested, instead of providing any evidence or even a shred of supporting documentation, he resorts to homophobic and other childish insults to hide his embarrassment.
I learnt that long ago.
Now if you do need me to explain 'long ago' as a relative term, and in doing so, give me the opportunity to explain Woody's shocking behaviour, just say so.

 

[^woody^]

Dear John is on my ignored list so I don't see his posts ..........are you really saying he's dropped a clanger and posted although the same person as though it's two different people ? If he has, he needs professional help.

No he's quoted and posted under his JD name, but the way he bizarrely answerd his own quote is as if he's another person. He probably had a tab open for each identity and forgot to switch to the appropriate one for his reply. The plot thickens.

 

[Brigadier]

Just imagine his true post count.
It must be like a full-time job

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

No he's quoted and posted under his JD name, but the way he bizarrely answerd his own quote is as if he's another person. He probably had a tab open for each identity and forgot to switch to the appropriate one for his reply. The plot thickens.

I suspect he was simply repeating his request for you to provide some supporting evidence to justify your comment.
I learnt long ago that you make silly, infantile allegations without being in possession of, with no intention of attempting to provide, and no ability to provide any supporting evidence.
So you do what you do best, resort to insult and innuendo.

 

[EFLImpudence]

I thought he had staff.

 

[Deleted member 63160]

Ah bless! Do I really need to explain the concept of 'long ago' as a relative term?

Nope. You are ten. Makes sense. Bye.

 

[gasbanni]

No he's quoted and posted under his JD name, but the way he bizarrely answerd his own quote is as if he's another person. He probably had a tab open for each identity and forgot to switch to the appropriate one for his reply. The plot thickens.

Ooooooohhhhhh thats unsettling .....would a normal person do this one wonders.

 

[JohnD]

since the speculation is untrue, the question does not arise.

 

[^woody^]

Lol. Speculation can't be untrue.

 

[JohnD]

since the woody's suggestion is untrue, the question does not arise.

 

[^woody^]

since the woody's suggestion is untrue.

Can you provide proof of that?

 

[Notch7]

Ah bless! Do I really need to explain the concept of 'long ago' as a relative term?
I could do, and in doing so, explain how Woody makes unfounded allegations, then when requested, instead of providing any evidence or even a shred of supporting documentation, he resorts to homophobic and other childish insults to hide his embarrassment.
I learnt that long ago.
Now if you do need me to explain 'long ago' as a relative term, and in doing so, give me the opportunity to explain Woody's shocking behaviour, just say so.

You never did confrim which other names you have posted under....

or which aliases you are currently using

 

[IWalkLikeHimaMartian]

You never did confrim which other names you have posted under....

or which aliases you are currently using

I have confirmed the former: I posted under the username of NotSoSure, until woody made a silly, unjustified, unsupported allegation. This must be the umpteenth time I have confirmed that! But thank you for the opportunity, again, to point out woody's lack of integrity and infantile allegations, not to mention his juvenile resort to insult and innuendo.

On the latter, how can I confirm a zero, a nothing, a negative, an inanity? Apart from that, I do not have to!
If you wish to make allegations, I suggest you dig up some, any, supporting evidence to justify your allegation. Of course, if you are another woody-like character then you will continue to make silly comments without justification.
I have demonstrated how to make an allegation and provide much supporting evidence to justify that allegation in **** end's case of persistent and disgraceful deceit, and intentional downright lies. (Thank you again for the opportunity to repeat that allegation against **** end.)

You are proving that you have the same mindset as woody, you make unsupported, unsupportable, unproven, unverifiable allegations, and when challenged, you will no doubt, resort to insult and innuendo.
It is what you do!

 

[Notch7]

I have confirmed the former: I posted under the username of NotSoSure, until woody made a silly, unjustified, unsupported allegation. This must be the umpteenth time I have confirmed that! But thank you for the opportunity, again, to point out woody's lack of integrity and infantile allegations, not to mention his juvenile resort to insult and innuendo.

Ah ok, so it was all Woody's fault then?

 

[transam]

?? Way har bee ??

He was / is Himagin aka wannabe diyer aka bungalow bill aka andintil etc etc