this thread is about 9 months old!
It was my fault! I just search for what I'm looking for and ask on that thread. In a way that is a better system than asking some of the same questions on a new thread isn't it? But Rikki has probably gone - I just would have been interested to find out how he got on - wish people woudl give reports when they've finished as well as when they are posting looking for info ...
There are a few misconceptions going on here . . .
Firstly and the most obvious, motor antifreeze is ethanol but this degrades if its overheated.
I think that this is a dangerous statement. Motor antifreeze is not ethanol. Ethanol is normal "drinking" alcohol and is moderately toxic. Motor antifreeze is (well its main ingredient is) most often ethylene glycol, and it is highly toxic. Sometimes motor antifreeze is propylene glycol, which is used because it is less deadly, although I believe it doesn't perform as well for motor use.
Perhaps the point you wanted to make is that propylene glycol does not degrade when exposed to temperatures likely in a solar system in the same way that ethylene glycol does - of that I don't know off hand, but either way it is a bad idea to use normal car antifreeze in a solar system!
Just wondered about what considerations there were about using chemicals in "primary" pipework in case there was a mixing (I believe propylene glycol is still dangerous in more than small amounts although I have seen one solar company saying that they use "food grade glycol" implying it is safe which I doubt in the amounts present in solar systems)
Agile, what are some correct ways to account for the water "flashing to steam"/stagnating in a gravity solar system, or is it just improper to fit a gravity solar system? Pressurising the system would be one I suppose as already suggested, are there others? Longer pipework as lcgs suggested seems to be just a way of losing heat so the water going into the collector is cooler - and on a par with Rikkis idea of the blind?? (If Riki tested it on a very hot summer day then surely there isn't so much problem is there? If he has a vent then is it dangerous or just inconvenient if there is stagnation?)
I think one of the manufacturer sites I read seemed to suggest that you could install a gravity system without sensors or any valves as it was self regulating in some way, but I can see how it could continue to heat and heat the cylinder to a dangerous state on a really hot sunny day.
(With some electric pumped systems the manfs says they cannot possible be allowed to be without a pump so the pump must be dc and have a battery back up in case of power outage - but then what if the pump dies???!!!)
(Not quite sure the answer is letting only qualified professionals do it as sadly with other jobs in my house in recent years the quality of workmanship is on a rapid downward spiral - it seemed to be better in the days with less regs- the supposedly qualified people have done some horrible things in my house that would not be "normal practice" - well, it is normal sadly - its correct practice we are looking for. And anyway, surely better if a householder (and tradesmen of other trades than the one in question) understands fully the dangers of the systems they are living with and a good way to find out is to build them themselves - i.e. strange how unvented HW cylinders are subject to regs but vented aren't - yet you could turn a vented into unvented if either connected up improperly in the first place, or you damaged/blocked the vent pipe - ok you could say everyting in house has to be regulated but someone could do somethign stupid to electrics/plumbing etc in the course of decorating or just messing around in their house .)