No.Isn't that one of those ad hominem duberrys that you whinge about
That would be, for example, if I tried to argue that you were wrong about a cable sizing calculation because of your dodgy views on the FIT subsidy scheme.
No.Isn't that one of those ad hominem duberrys that you whinge about
By your logic, all forms of renewables that are weather dependent i.e. solar energy and wind energy cannot be relied on as a secure alternative source of energy. I am minded to agree with you but I might argue that it is possible to allow us a little diversity here. The days that are windy may not be sunny; equally the days that are sunny may not be windy. However I do concede that there are sunless, windless days in winter. We probably need nuclear power after all.I share the opinion that, in these latitudes, the amount of solar radiation we receive means that, without subsidy, present systems are uneconomic. This doesn't mean that they will necessarily be so in the future.
On the contrary, they can never be economic. The output of this generation can never be counted towards the capacity needed to meet maximum demand because of the variability of sunlight. You need backup generation too. That doubles the capital cost of capacity.
Back in the 1970's electricity was overpriced because of the massive subsidy in favour of the coal industry. Thatcher brought this to an end and the cost of electricity fell. Labour got back in and grabbed subsidies for their pet ideas of carbon taxing. We are now paying more or less the same cross subsidy as in the 1970's.
The FIT is a particularly nasty subsidy because it takes from the poor who can't afford to buy plant to stick on their roof and gives to the rich who can. Don't say that the poor can have their installation paid for: they lose the huge value of the FIT and are only left with the value of the kWh generated.
Wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong.However, this is a DIY forum and I think it is better not to enter into the ethics as opposed to the practicalities of alternative energy sources.
There are also people who believe that a cosmic Jewish Zombie can make them live forever if they symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him they accept him as their master, so he can remove an evil force from their soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree.
But it will become pointless if and when you flick a switch and nothing happens because we stopped nuclear/coal/gas power stations producing electricity and relied on sea, sun and wind..... but just because it costs a lot doesn't mean it doesn't work. Just because a wind turbine produces less than Sellafield doesn't mean it's pointless.
PJ
Yes.1 - does the technology work, ie produce electricity?
No.2 - does it produce enough on its own to replace the existing grid system?
No, just as long as you want little more than lighting powered by electricity, and then only when the sun is shining.And if not, does that actually matter?
Huge amounts.3 - how much does it cost?
You tell us.If it costs more than the present system does that rule it out?
If it costs more than people can afford to pay, who will use it?Obviously all these become interdependent in an individual's decision whether or not to go with a new technology, but just because it costs a lot doesn't mean it doesn't work.
Unfair comparison - Sellafield doesn't produce electricity....Just because a wind turbine produces less than Sellafield doesn't mean it's pointless.
Well actually you are here...Who's talking about turning off power stations? It's this sort of comment which turns debate into pointless noise.
It is amazing how many people seem to live in the green bubble world of narnia. Their insatiable desire to promote renewables, at any cost, regardless of their effectiveness, couple with their ostrich like belief that somehow renewables will provide us with all the energy we need is absolute rubbish. Furthermore, when challenged over the practicality of this desire and cost effectiveness the best they can come up with is 'insulate your homes'.But in planning for the future it's worth bearing in mind how much of our gas and oil (and uranium) comes from other countries, and question how much power we could generate if those countries decided to hang on to it for their own use.PJ
Your comparison of wind power with nuclear power does actually re-enforce the fact that wind power is pointless in terms of availability and cost effectiveness.Obviously all these become interdependent in an individual's decision whether or not to go with a new technology, but just because it costs a lot doesn't mean it doesn't work. Just because a wind turbine produces less than Sellafield doesn't mean it's pointless.
PJ
Indeed let him (even though he'll have a problem making the lights work at night, when he wants them).If Mr Smith of 10 railway cuttings wants to power his lights by pv generation, let him. its is saving on our resources.
That may happen.and saying that, the limited traditional resources of our planet will eventuallually expire.Some day in the mid/far future there will be vast pv generation in africa, cental america, australia and india and china. yes we will pay for it to be transmitted here, but the human resolve, inginuity and demand will make it happen.
FIT incentives are not designed to fund worthwhile experiments.Grow up disbelievers and lets experiment and have some failures for the the sake of our grand childrens children.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local