I think any distnce would pass according to the letter of the law and/or cops/CPS wouldn't try to prosecute.
One way to find out - try it.
Me, I'm happy to go for my MOT's, where I have gone the past 40 years, just a few hundred yards from my door.
I think any distnce would pass according to the letter of the law and/or cops/CPS wouldn't try to prosecute.
Back in the 'eighties a work colleague who was an ex Met. motorcyclist told me that a traffic stop by him was not valid unless he removed his helmet prior to speaking to the vehicle's driver.Don't you recall all those cases years ago with early breathalyser stops ? IIRC the law said "when stopped by a police-officer in ( full ? ) uniform " and then there were endless legal arguments about whether the law was applicable if the officer wasn't wearing his hat/cap which meant ( so the argument went ) he was not in uniform and the stop therefore invalid.
I think any distnce would pass according to the letter of the law and/or cops/CPS wouldn't try to prosecute.
About 2 hundred in my case & I guess around 20 years.One way to find out - try it.
Me, I'm happy to go for my MOT's, where I have gone the past 40 years, just a few hundred yards from my door.
Not quite that far back, around 8 years ago, me and a mate were out on an early Sunday morning motorcycle ride and he noticed an unmarked police BMW tailing us at a distance for some time so we kept to the legal limit (we were in contact with each other via Bluetooth headsets). He was a windscreen fitter and did a lot of work for the police at their Essex depot and recognised the bike. After a while, the copper put his lights on, caught us up and stopped us. Just checked our insurance, tax, mot's, licence etc. Within minutes a TV camera crew turned up and started filming him questioning us (it never made the programme as he had nothing on us) but I do remember that after he stopped us and before he spoke to us, he removed his helmet and put on a 'police' marked baseball cap.Back in the 'eighties a work colleague who was an ex Met. motorcyclist told me that a traffic stop by him was not valid unless he removed his helmet prior to speaking to the vehicle's driver.
Whether that ruling still applies ..
Anpr doesn't pick up MOT. So even if you encountered such an event, it would only detect lack of tax (and/or insurance). So as long as the MOT was booked and the car was in a good state no action would be taken. That bored policeman wouldn't want the agro.I suspect that to get stopped you would need to encounter a police car with Anpr active and a bored policeman
Cool story bro.Not quite that far back, around 8 years ago, me and a mate were out on an early Sunday morning motorcycle ride and he noticed an unmarked police BMW tailing us at a distance for some time so we kept to the legal limit (we were in contact with each other via Bluetooth headsets). He was a windscreen fitter and did a lot of work for the police at their Essex depot and recognised the bike. After a while, the copper put his lights on, caught us up and stopped us. Just checked our insurance, tax, mot's, licence etc. Within minutes a TV camera crew turned up and started filming him questioning us (it never made the programme as he had nothing on us) but I do remember that after he stopped us and before he spoke to us, he removed his helmet and put on a 'police' marked baseball cap.
Anpr doesn't pick up MOT.
No.
It doesnt
Yes. And the racAre you saying the AA is wrong ?
Driving without an MOT | The AA
We explain the risks and penalties of driving without an MOT, and what you're allowed to do if your car fails its MOT.www.theaa.com
Yes. And the rac
The information is available separately, but not via anpr
You don't have to believe me. Watch the TV programmes carefully. See if they ever mention MOT, until AFTER the car is stopped and checkedStill not sure I agree with you ......... as I've seen it done on the TV
You don't have to believe me. Watch the TV programmes carefully. See if they ever mention MOT, until AFTER the car is stopped and checked