There's also the question, particularly in a kitchen, of 'when is a spur a spur'.
If each of the under-counter appliances is plugged into an under-counter socket which is fed as a spur from a ring final circuit, then that is called 'multiple spurs', and deprecated by some.
However, it seems quite fashionable to have above-counter switches/isolators for each appliance (discrete ones, or a bank of grid switches) each feeding an under-counter socket (or sometimes even FCU) for the appliance concerned. This seems to be regarded as being at least 'acceptable', and at least some seem to regard it as a 'good practice'. However, is it logical that inserting a switch in the cable changes it from being a 'deprecated spur' to an acceptable, perhaps even 'good', practice?
Kind Regards, John
If each of the under-counter appliances is plugged into an under-counter socket which is fed as a spur from a ring final circuit, then that is called 'multiple spurs', and deprecated by some.
However, it seems quite fashionable to have above-counter switches/isolators for each appliance (discrete ones, or a bank of grid switches) each feeding an under-counter socket (or sometimes even FCU) for the appliance concerned. This seems to be regarded as being at least 'acceptable', and at least some seem to regard it as a 'good practice'. However, is it logical that inserting a switch in the cable changes it from being a 'deprecated spur' to an acceptable, perhaps even 'good', practice?
Kind Regards, John