- Joined
- 1 Apr 2016
- Messages
- 13,609
- Reaction score
- 552
- Country
I’m not concerned about that in the slightest. If they’re law abiding, neither should they. I live near Upminster train station. It’s at the very end of the District line. I’ve lost count of the number of school kids that have been relieved of their bikes, phones and trainers by gangs of black, yes, black kids that don’t live here but come down on the train to carry out street robbery. Since the police started stop search on black kids hanging around the station in summer with hooded puffer jackets on, the number of robberies have gone down. Fact - although you might not like it. Mind you, of late they have got street smart and it seems that the 'weapon' of choice is……a metal walking crutch. I kid you not.
Each innocent person you stop is one opportunity missed in stopping a possible felon. So tell me why not having more Police is a better response? Wait on you just said that yourself but then vote against it.
You think because they are black kids committing this crime I will defend them? Lol it just shows your bigotry. Note that in my criticism of extending the power I did not mention the effect on ethnic minorities because it is secondary to the more important issue which you again fail to address.
So you just argued against yourself again. You described who the criminals are and what they are doing - that is enough to stop and search people who fit that description - it's warranted and an efficient use of resources. Extending this power so that without suspicion you can cast the net wider does not mean you will catch more its more likely you may miss people who you should stop.