Direct quote from the FA's report:- "Mr Evra and Mr Suarez gave very different and contradictory accounts to us of what took place"
In other words, they took one players word over the other.
Evra alleged that Suarez used a racist term (in Spanish) on at least six or seven seperate occasions. Suarez admitted using the same term, which he claimed is used in his native dialect as a pure descriptive not as any form of insult, on just one occasion.
One of them is obviously lying, and the fact that none of the other dozen players in the penalty area waiting for a corner to be taken heard ANY of the "six or seven" racist remarks makes me think it's most likely to be Evra.
Even the linguistic "experts" who were brought in couldn't completely agree on the matter of whether or not the term used is racist in the context of the particular dialect of the Spanish language which Suarez speaks.
Had I been on a jury, I wouldn't have been certain enough of the evidence to convict. But Suarez never got a jury, he got judged and sentenced by a bunch of people with a vested interest in appearing tough on racism in the sport they all make huge piles of money out of.
Basically, as soon as the allegation was made Suarez never stood a chance - whether he was guilty or innocent the outcome was always going to be the same.
If that had happened to me then there's NO WAY I'd ever shake the hand of the man who made the allegations.
In other words, they took one players word over the other.
Evra alleged that Suarez used a racist term (in Spanish) on at least six or seven seperate occasions. Suarez admitted using the same term, which he claimed is used in his native dialect as a pure descriptive not as any form of insult, on just one occasion.
One of them is obviously lying, and the fact that none of the other dozen players in the penalty area waiting for a corner to be taken heard ANY of the "six or seven" racist remarks makes me think it's most likely to be Evra.
Even the linguistic "experts" who were brought in couldn't completely agree on the matter of whether or not the term used is racist in the context of the particular dialect of the Spanish language which Suarez speaks.
Had I been on a jury, I wouldn't have been certain enough of the evidence to convict. But Suarez never got a jury, he got judged and sentenced by a bunch of people with a vested interest in appearing tough on racism in the sport they all make huge piles of money out of.
Basically, as soon as the allegation was made Suarez never stood a chance - whether he was guilty or innocent the outcome was always going to be the same.
If that had happened to me then there's NO WAY I'd ever shake the hand of the man who made the allegations.