- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 12,597
- Reaction score
- 984
- Country
Edited
No evidence then ?
So no evidence or official report then ?Timeline: Who Says What Happened When With Sue Gray
Above is the current Sue Gray timeline of events, according to what is in the public domain and based on what Labour would have everyone believe aboutorder-order.com
someone else has done a much better job of pulling it together - it also explains why they are all going with no comment as its hard to get your story straight until you have briefed everyone.
It's a link to Guido Fawkes.So no evidence or official report then ?
Can't open your link, does it have that press release in it ?
Is it an official report ?I thought you couldn't read it. and yet you've concluded its rubbish?
If you got a speeding ticket and when asked by magistrates was it you driving JohnD, and you went with "no comment". do you think you would:
Yep - just like KC who advised Gray during her report.. Doesn't make him wrong though.It's a link to Guido Fawkes.
MediaBias.facts Checked conclude he retains a strong right-wing bias, so i'd expect him to be supportive of the Tory position.
That isn't to say he's wrong, though; just biased.
That depends if you were collared by the same copper you allege had a pop at me on my 'trip' to the pub.If I was prosecuted for a motoring offence, and the prosecution offered no evidence that an offence had been committed, I would probably not be convicted.
What happens in your country?
Trial by newspaper?
its fair for people to conclude, they are hiding something. Why would you hide something, when you could put the record straight?
Why would you hide something, when you could put the record straight?
and by the way you'd probably get 5 points and a means test fine.