Of course you are - but you wrote (albeit to EFLI, but 'in public') "I would say that you are assuming the absence of faults." - so I was just pointing out that I personally had posted, early on, about the possibility of faults, but had said that (at least for me) that did not represent a compelling reason to have a switch.I assume, though, that I am allowed an opinion too...
If you are more comfortable with having a dedicated switch, then that's obviously fine - there are almost no downsides other than the (very small) issues associated with introducing an additional 'point of potential failure'.
Kind Regards, John