- Joined
- 1 Apr 2016
- Messages
- 13,609
- Reaction score
- 552
- Country
But at least his dad gave him a b ollocking!
Mottie knows when to crack the whip.
But at least his dad gave him a b ollocking!
No. Made no plans to travel but I tell you one thing, when we say we are going, we go.Have you and the dog been barred from travelling again?
Ah, so THATS why you won’t disclose the county you live in. All makes sense now.Funny also how Essex has a large proportion of 'idiots'...
Brilliant! Thanks for that.Andrew Banks, of Stansted, Essex, said he attended the demonstrations in the city centre in a bid to 'protect statues' - though admitted in court today he wasn't sure which memorials he was there to defend."
Any 'left wing thugs' out there 'defending' statues they don't know about?
Any 'left wing thugs' out there 'defending' statues they don't know about?
What statues was he "pizzing" on ?Brilliant! Thanks for that.
Maybe he thought defending them meant pizzing on 'em.
Read the words."
Andrew Banks, of Stansted, Essex, said he attended the demonstrations in the city centre in a bid to 'protect statues' - though admitted in court today he wasn't sure which memorials he was there to defend."
What statues was he "pizzing" on ?
OK, which memorials was he "pizzing" on?Read the words.
Stop it now, or someone will nail your other foot to the floor.OK, which memorials was he "pizzing" on?
Not defending, defacing.Any 'left wing thugs' out there 'defending' statues they don't know about?
? You need to take a grip and read the news articles.Stop it now, or someone will nail your other foot to the floor.
OK, which memorials was he "pizzing" on?
Stop it now, or someone will nail your other foot to the floor.
And you need to stop going round in circles.? You need to take a grip and read the news articles.
Well it seems the much lauded (on here by a few at least) anti UK press BBC, Grauniad (intentional spelling mistake,unlike theirs) agree with me, no mention of the word "on" in regard to the morons "pizzing" , they now use words like beside, next to,near, and don't say it was "on". I may be being pedantic, but at least I'm not wrong.And you need to stop going round in circles.
Magistrate would convict most likelyBut is it worth the trouble? If it goes to a jury you'll have people queuing up to fund the defence team, the risk that a jury will acquit despite the facts of the case and cries that they're wasting resources when actual crimes are happening. And all that for a statue no one really cares about.
I don't care one way or the other but I can see why it's not being pursued, at least for now.
Only racists have a problem with the defacing of statues glorifying racists!Not defending, defacing.