Tents ⛺️

  • Thread starter Deleted member 294929
  • Start date
Sponsored Links
Don't talk so stupid, the amount of self employed people in the heating game only doing two or three days a week cos they're earning good coin is just one example
I’ve no idea what that has to do with wealth distribution

Is not this what's happening since covid that people can get by on lesser money working from home and if not working from home a four day week
Obviously you’ve not heard about the millions suffering fuel and food poverty.

nor the millions trapped in the rental sector



As for this idea of “lazy forkers working from home” - it’s just a right wing blame game used by tw@ts like Jacob Rees Mogg.

Gant you fall for these lazy tropes far too easily
 
I’ve no idea what that has to do with wealth distribution


Obviously you’ve not heard about the millions suffering fuel and food poverty.

nor the millions trapped in the rental sector



As for this idea of “lazy forkers working from home” - it’s just a right wing blame game used by tw@ts like Jacob Rees Mogg.

Gant you fall for these lazy tropes far too easily
Are you not falling for the speel that there's millions who are poor.
What is the definition of poor these days?
 
Sponsored Links
Are you not falling for the speel that there's millions who are poor.
What is the definition of poor these days?
What about those that work full time and still need benefits to live on?

Sounds poor to me
 
Are you not falling for the speel that there's millions who are poor
the 3.16 million in fuel poverty for a start

or the 4.7 million in food poverty.


In 2022, there were an estimated 13.4 per cent of households (3.26 million) in fuel poverty in England under the Low Income Low Energy Efficiency (LILEE) metric, up from 13.1 per cent in 2021 (3.16 million


No doubt you will come up with some bolox about women turning up in range rovers to visit food banks


 
Are you not falling for the speel that there's millions who are poor.
What is the definition of poor these days?
Gant who lives in a mortgage free house says: “there’s no such thing as poverty”
 
And yet people will vote in the next election hoping things will change.
Beggars belief.

When one is convinced that it will get worse, if a) one doesn't vote, or b) votes for more of the same, what is one to do?
The only option is to vote for a party (and we only get one vote) that one hopes will improve the situation.
 
You fall for every Daily Mail trope in the book


hilarious seeing R/W journos writing about the lazy workers all sitting at home, whilst said journos are sitting at home
Says the man who voted for Brexit, and now believes that Hamas are terrorists because the UK, US, Isralei government say so.
Believing in Brexit was a political choice, if it were not so, everyone would have voted for Brexit, according to the promises of what it would deliver.
Assigning the label of terrorist to an organisation is a political act. If it were not so, all countries and the UN would arrive at the same conclusion of who is terrorist.
Defending a proven racist is a perverted act of support, yet you have demonstrated such inexcusable support.

You choices of who to believe are either political or perverted support for a racist. Political choices can be wrong, and support for racists is undeniably wrong. Yet prior to your Damascene moments, you argue vehemently for your political choice, and argue for your defence of racism, resorting to the typical innuendos, illustrated above, presented as reasonable arguments.
They're ad hominem attacks, not arguments.

When all that fails, your antagonist is prevented from posting,with the excuse of ad hominem attacks.
 
Says the man who voted for Brexit, and now believes that Hamas are terrorists because the UK, US, Isralei government say so.
Believing in Brexit was a political choice, if it were not so, everyone would have voted for Brexit, according to the promises of what it would deliver.
Assigning the label of terrorist to an organisation is a political act. If it were not so, all countries and the UN would arrive at the same conclusion of who is terrorist.
Defending a proven racist is a perverted act of support, yet you have demonstrated such inexcusable support.

You choices of who to believe are either political or perverted support for a racist. Political choices can be wrong, and support for racists is undeniably wrong. Yet prior to your Damascene moments, you argue vehemently for your political choice, and argue for your defence of racism, resorting to the typical innuendos, illustrated above, presented as reasonable arguments.
They're ad hominem attacks, not arguments.

When all that fails, your antagonist is prevented from posting,with the excuse of ad hominem attacks.
Himmie, please stop trying to get another thread shut because you lost the argument on another thread.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top