Did you read the whole article, or just look at the (typically) misleading headline?According to one news paper yes https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ing-Boris-Johnson-spent-50-000-donations.html
Did you read the whole article, or just look at the (typically) misleading headline?According to one news paper yes https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ing-Boris-Johnson-spent-50-000-donations.html
I think Motorbiking is making the point that anyone who tries to take action against a lying politician must therefore be of dubious virtue, so they must be discredited, so the case for politicians not being allowed to lie is therefore weakened.
All of us are a 'victim' if we accept that politicians can lie at will, and then do the opposite of what they said...Being neither a victim
He joins others in their legal pursuance of justice, or those found guilty: Gina Miller, the imprisonment of Paul Santana, Mohammed Saddiq and Babar Saddiq, Murli Mirchandani, Anton Vickerman, and numerous others.Nope, I'm commented that Mr Ball falls in to a very small set of private prosecutors. Being neither a victim nor a charity/institution set up to protect against the things he is prosecuting.
He appears to be a political activists.
See my earlier postIs it possible to be elected to office, while being utterly truthful, at all times?
"Truth hurts" ; by telling the truth , would that not risk alienating enough of the voters, as to make one unelectable?
Serious question.
See my earlier post
Is it possible to be elected to office by telling deliberate lies, in order to win an election?
Yes it is.
Should it be?
Serious question.
Yes...Which one? The "Nordic" one?
Yes...
All of us are a 'victim' if we accept that politicians can lie at will, and then do the opposite of what they said...
There was a few years ago a person in a nordic country whose campaign was based on not promising to do anything he promised he would do if elected...
He was voted in, and had the greatest get out clause ever!