C
cumbriahandyman
Just count up how many agree with you and how many dont!! Easy
That from someone who does not know the difference between a guarantee and insurance.
I think I will stick with the published facts.
Just count up how many agree with you and how many dont!! Easy
Just count up how many agree with you and how many dont!! Easy
That from someone who does not know the difference between a guarantee and insurance.
I think I will stick with the published facts.
I reckon this puts it into a little more perspective...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Best-selling_artist_of_all-time[/QUOTE]
Sales mean nothing.
Everyone knows that the Holy Bible is the best selling book of all time.
I read it and thought it was pretty boring, compared to say.....Bravo Two Zero......or The Da Vinci Code
Well it appears conclusively based on the responses on here, the concensus is that the Beatles were no where near the best.
Based on responses of half a dozen people in this thread you have concluded what?
I reckon this puts it into a little more perspective...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Best-selling_artist_of_all-time[/QUOTE]
you reckon wrong IMO. your opinion and that of the unwashed masses doesn't mean they are the "best", that is purely a matter of opinion after all. sales don't equate to genius IMO, merely towing the line for a living.
nearly all of the artists in that list are merely pawns of a money grabbing industry.
the beatles were pioneers of pop perhaps, but until later on rock was a little out of their reach. again all IMO, have the good grace to admit while they were clever they are not the be all as that simply isn't possible.
I reckon this puts it into a little more perspective...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Best-selling_artist_of_all-time[/QUOTE]
Sales mean nothing.
Everyone knows that the Holy Bible is the best selling book of all time.
I read it and thought it was pretty boring, compared to say.....Bravo Two Zero......or The Da Vinci Code
the da vinci code was ****!
Pink Floyd now they were the best ever