- Joined
- 1 Apr 2016
- Messages
- 13,609
- Reaction score
- 552
- Country
This bit.
Not testing enough is of course going to miss those with mild symptoms, but there is no evidence and I also couldn't find any credible research to suggest anyone is even making the claim, that it will result in under reporting fatality rates. However, fatal infections seem to be lasting from 2 - 8 weeks according to the W.H.O. Far too few critically ill people are recovering.
In terms of critical care, how on earth does a hospital prepare for intake that may be in hospital for such a wide deviation. Crazy situation.
It's not opinion as you suggest. I have been pointing out many times that we are undereporting deaths. If prominent cases are not being recorded, how many are slipping under the radar?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...s-emerges-as-a-hotspot-for-coronavirus-deaths
The figures emerged amid continuing confusion over the number of virus-related deaths after NHS England changed how the data was reported and it emerged that people dying at home of suspected cases were not included.
However, some prominent cases do not appear to be reflected in the figures, such as that of Kayla Williams, a 36-year-old mother from Peckham, who died just before paramedics arrived and was recorded by them as a possible Covid-19 case.
Chloe Middleton, the 21-year-old from Buckinghamshire whose family said on Wednesday she died after contracting coronavirus, also does not appear to be recorded in the figures.
An NHS England source said the likely cause of people missing from the statistics is that the daily figures only include those who tested positive in hospital.
The UK is only testing people for coronavirus in hospital, so people dying at home or in care homes with symptoms of the disease will be missing from the overall figures.