It's hardly a small number I think, but the point is out of all known fossils they haven't found a single one which doesn't fit in with the current theory.
So it would seem This would explain Wayne Rooney as a viable entity How else woukd such a monster evolve from a womb!
One could play devil's advocate here and suggest that the reason they haven't found one is because they haven't been looking for one, or indeed perhaps they have found numerous examples but have discarded them as they haven't even countenanced their true identities.It's hardly a small number I think, but the point is out of all known fossils they haven't found a single one which doesn't fit in with the current theory.
Being a boring old tw*t I once worked out how far a jet flying at 500 mph would have gone by now if it had set off for our neighbouring galaxy at the time of Earth's creation.http://deeptime.info
Holding down a tab ,eg Dinosaurs, makes a line outside the clock appear. It puts the timescales into perspective.
It really is sad to see people arguing against something from a position of ignorance. Most of the creationists I read just don't understand the theory of evolution, so the cases they make against it are too easy to dismantle.
Of course Out of idle curiosity, where did you do your degree!
Oh,I don't know. A creationist friend of mine made a good observation that all of these models that purportedly demonstrate Darwinism tend to leap from one example to another and that there are no intermediate "gentle" differences which one would expect if there was a continuous miniscule evolution.Where as Creationists, believe any old twaddle they are indoctrinated with as being the truth without any substantiated evidence, in my opinion
That's a great guess as it happens. Just about spot on. I made it about 3 light years. Or somewhere near the nearest star, fcking amazing or what? the sheer stupendousness of it all.
Yeah, great links, I've seen them already, all very mind blowing, enough to make anyone feel a planck.
This is a good game Let's narrow it down to regionOf course Out of idle curiosity, where did you do your degree!
Totally irrelevant of course, but it was from one of the long established REAL Universities of the 60's with a couple of hundred years of history, certainly not a POLY.
One of the more unusual explanations that I've heard is that god did in fact create everything a few thousand years ago, including the appearance of evolution having taken place. Cheeky little tinker that he is It's all an illusionOh,I don't know. A creationist friend of mine made a good observation that all of these models that purportedly demonstrate Darwinism tend to leap from one example to another and that there are no intermediate "gentle" differences which one would expect if there was a continuous miniscule evolution.Where as Creationists, believe any old twaddle they are indoctrinated with as being the truth without any substantiated evidence, in my opinion
An observation with which I don't totally agree , but creationist do exactly this and explain inconsistencies with statements such as we are not clever enough to understand God's thinking.
An excuse which I find rather convenient and avoiding the issue.
Science however tries very very hard to determine the cause of the inconsistencies. Science is very open about the inconsistencies, whereas creationists hide behind the God mantra to reconcile the inexplicable.