This didn't happen, it's not real.

Sponsored Links
Newboy, let me tell you a story.
A few years ago, there was on this forum, a prolific poster who commented extensively on legal matters and the law in general. And it may be true to say that many of the members here, were very much in awe of this man. That is, until one day he made a very simple mistake and totally destroyed his credibility. He used a 3 letter word in the wrong context. The problem was, that this simple word was, and is, used day after day by all those engaged in matters legal and yet he used it in a way that clearly demonstrated that he did not know it's true meaning. The fact that he edited the post shortly afterwards, counted for nothing. Too many members had read the original. It is ever so easy to expose the truth by spotting basic errors.Take for example, the following statement:

I'd suggest that you may have some fundamental physiological issues if you gain pleasure from the reaction you get posting as you do.

Now I am quite sure that every single member on this forum bar one, knows the meaning of physiological and the difference between that and psychological. But that quote, together with:

A bit rich coming from that Champaign Socialist though.

does make one wonder. Can you really believe it when

I will be popping off to Kiev on business in a few weeks

I cant.
 
Sponsored Links
No - there ARE two

You no speaka da Queen's English?

You philistine it's a quote ! The actor was playing a northern rep it was a seventies programme the quote is accurate.

Try saying it with a emphatic Sean bean accent .......

There are two L's in B0ll0ks

There is two l's in B0ll0ks ....... ok get it now ?
 
Last edited:
Newboy, let me tell you a story.
A few years ago, there was on this forum, a prolific poster who commented extensively on legal matters and the law in general. And it may be true to say that many of the members here, were very much in awe of this man. That is, until one day he made a very simple mistake and totally destroyed his credibility. He used a 3 letter word in the wrong context. The problem was, that this simple word was, and is, used day after day by all those engaged in matters legal and yet he used it in a way that clearly demonstrated that he did not know it's true meaning. The fact that he edited the post shortly afterwards, counted for nothing. Too many members had read the original. It is ever so easy to expose the truth by spotting basic errors.Take for example, the following statement:

I'd suggest that you may have some fundamental physiological issues if you gain pleasure from the reaction you get posting as you do.

Now I am quite sure that every single member on this forum bar one, knows the meaning of physiological and the difference between that and psychological. But that quote, together with:

A bit rich coming from that Champaign Socialist though.

does make one wonder. Can you really believe it when

I will be popping off to Kiev on business in a few weeks

I cant.

Oh blah blah bloody blah
 
You philistine it's a quote !

Sorry - that one passed me by

Presumably the news way of saying the same thing (in street talk) is:

"There am two l's in *******s"?

I admit you probably weren't to know it, it's just years back it was used as a a disparaging put down in my circle quoting the actor in a gruff voice . Saying there 'are ' as opposed to 'IS' doesnt quite do it justice. The 'is'makes it emphatic to labour the point the actor was saying 'B0ll0ks !"
 
I'd suggest that you may have some fundamental physiological issues if you gain pleasure from the reaction you get posting as you do.

Now then Bolo, if you would care to go back to the original text, you will see that this is a copy of what Newboy wrote to me. I cut and pasted them into my post for all to see... These are not my words, they are Newboy's words.

Now you can extract both of your feet from your mouth and get back into your box.
 
Now I am quite sure that every single member on this forum bar one, knows the meaning of physiological and the difference between that and psychological.

Sadly my mistake - dyslexia and spellcheckers are sometimes not my best friends!

The content was lifted from my post and hence is my mistake
 
That is, until one day he made a very simple mistake and totally destroyed his credibility.

You mean you actually had credibility once? Your spelling is worse than mine. Now, if you had chosen to attack my syntax and grammar, then you'd have had a point.
 
Now I am quite sure that every single member on this forum bar one, knows the meaning of physiological and the difference between that and psychological.

Sadly my mistake - dyslexia and spellcheckers are sometimes not my best friends!

The content was lifted from my post and hence is my mistake
With that predictive text thing sometimes words other than your own are inserted without you noticing. It happens no issues.
Bolo was trying to nit pick Davie Jones and it's back fired
 
Now I am quite sure that every single member on this forum bar one, knows the meaning of physiological and the difference between that and psychological.

Sadly my mistake - dyslexia and spellcheckers are sometimes not my best friends!

The content was lifted from my post and hence is my mistake
I don't judge people on their communication skills, although I had noticed the error and I knew what you were saying so I didn't feel it was a point worthy of a song and dance.. Having said that, you're still a ****
 
Last edited:
Sponsored Links
Back
Top