hundreds of trillions of people.
more nonsense from godwas
hundreds of trillions of people.
not sure off the direct connection social services come directly out the council account vaccinations will be i would think out the health budget with little other than subsiquential costs like building running costs rather than the full operation costs ??"As cases of the highly transmissible Omicron variant continue to sweep across the UK, it is understood the Treasury is drawing up plans to ensure adults are jabbed at least every three to six months.
The booster programme, which could cost as much as £5billion a year, may stay in place indefinitely in order to keep on top of any dangerous mutations that appear in the future, according to the Sunday Times."
And how are they (we!) going to pay for this?
"The newspaper reports that it is understood the health and social care levy, intended to raise £12billion a year for the NHS and adult social care reforms, will be used to fund the unexpected expense."
The social care services (especially adult ones) are vastly under resourced already and services are closing all over the place. Thus councils have to pick up the pieces but they don't have the resources to do so...
Thus other services will have to be cut or dropped, and money raised elsewhere somehow found.
Where from is the question...
The disruption phase takes another leap forward!
You should know by now that Ellal won't respond to questions that are unanswerable even in threads the little covid coward starts. Ellal will probably just respond to my post as a diversionary tactic but yours will go unanswered or the reply will just be a pointless question.Ellal
Think about it for a minute. You think vaccination is going to cost the NHS dear? How much more expensive would it be to not vaccinate then deal with all the COVID cases?
And I don't just mean expensive as in ££££. I mean human capital too. The cost of losing exhausted workers who leave and those who die after contracting COVID from their patients.
We know that a vaccinated person can still be infected with COVID, but the symptoms are far less severe.
So which is going to be cheaper?
not always. In fact grossly innacurate.but the symptoms are far less severe.
In fact grossly innacurate.
Aww bless...You should know by now that Ellal won't respond to questions that are unanswerable even in threads the little covid coward starts. Ellal will probably just respond to my post as a diversionary tactic but yours will go unanswered or the reply will just be a pointless question.
the 'covid coward'
being honest with yourself - do you think this is more stubbornness? A need for your choice to be "right" no matter how much the evidence builds against?Aww bless...
It's the creepy stalker again...
I ain't the 'covid coward' simply because I have courage of my convictions as regards what is happening...
The real cowards are those like yourself who will simply bend over and ask 'how far do you want to shove it'
You tell me the answer...Ellal
Think about it for a minute. You think vaccination is going to cost the NHS dear? How much more expensive would it be to not vaccinate then deal with all the COVID cases?
And I don't just mean expensive as in ££££. I mean human capital too. The cost of losing exhausted workers who leave and those who die after contracting COVID from their patients.
We know that a vaccinated person can still be infected with COVID, but the symptoms are far less severe.
So which is going to be cheaper?
You tell me the answer...
This is my point about conspiracy theoriesbecause I have courage of my convictions as