Unfortunately there is nothing new under it: But you know what? The sun still rose this morning....
Unfortunately there is nothing new under it: But you know what? The sun still rose this morning....
Oh, I thought you were just putting forward hypothetical points for the sake of discussion.... I must have misunderstood.If you wanted to know, you could have just asked
The "hypothetical point for discussion" comment was made when you kept asking me to provide the proof I supposedly said existed - which, of course I didn't say, as already explained.
(which you seemed to have taken as an assertion by me that there was evidence).
(which you seemed to have taken as an assertion by me that there was evidence).
This is where your confusion arises, I did not say that you said that there was evidence, just asked for an example of this unspecified evidence that you said may exist.
Now you tell me that I said that according to you there was evidence, I said no such thing.
You haven't answered the question.
Sooey, you said :-
"I'd already stated there wasn't any, so you stating that there may be is far from hypothetical, to me anyway, and I have the perfect right to ask you to show me some, though I know you can't."
As you say, it's useful to be able to look back on previous posts.
That's your assertion that I was saying that there was evidence, and not using a hypothetical point.
Sooey, you said :-
"I'd already stated there wasn't any, so you stating that there may be is far from hypothetical, to me anyway, and I have the perfect right to ask you to show me some, though I know you can't."
As you say, it's useful to be able to look back on previous posts.
You still seem confused.That's your assertion that I was saying that there was evidence, and not using a hypothetical point.
Where did I assert that you said that there was evidence?
I repeat, you said that there may be evidence, I asked you to give an example.
I'm surprised its got to ten pages without it being locked,full praise for everyone in keeping it on the right track.
intended to make a hyptohetical point, you decided it was "far from hyptothetical", I've tried to re-establish the hyptothetical nature of my point but you seem unable to accept that. That, as far as I can tell, is why there's confusion between us.
intended to make a hyptohetical point, you decided it was "far from hyptothetical", I've tried to re-establish the hyptothetical nature of my point but you seem unable to accept that. That, as far as I can tell, is why there's confusion between us.
Well, perhaps if you could spell it right, you have just had three goes there.
Anyway let's give that one a rest, it's become a bit boring. But don't put words in my "mouth" based on what you think I mean.