D
Deleted member 174758
But that"s Germany and Schroeder's money comes from Russia, the the average German isn't affected by it. In the UK, meanwhile, the COVID deals, etc have mainly been paid for by the taxpayer...
But that"s Germany and Schroeder's money comes from Russia, the the average German isn't affected by it. In the UK, meanwhile, the COVID deals, etc have mainly been paid for by the taxpayer...
the the average German isn't affected by it.
GS means nothing to me or the poor in the UK. Does he pay tax here? Don't know why you keep bringing him up. Meanwhile, rich Tory chums/donors rub their greedy chubby hands with glee at the prospect of Brexit Britain.You could add together every Conservative brexit money maker, covid deals, etc etc etc and no doubt it would amount to an awful lot of money.
Compare it to what Gerhard Schroder has made from Russian pipeline deals and making the EU totally reliant on Russian gas, it would amount to a p155 in the ocean.
My response was to an idiot suggesting all corruption stems from Brexit, conveniently ignoring worse corruption in the EU
We prefer the term 'information worker' thank you very much.Pen pushing pencil neck.
You won't have a referendum on PR until Labour can do some kind of deal with the Liberals.Hopefully Labour will win and change to PR, locking Tories out forever.
This country is being destroyed by Conservatives and their vested self interest.
not that Labour would be great - they wont win without Murdoch.
We have a pipe coming here as well. A country wants gas and doesn't have it. What do you think they should do? Employ you and get you to talk into the pipes might help a bit but sadly just hot air. They went for the easiest source of gas. Hardly surprising really. Schroder is more or less irrelevant.It's the EU and Schroeder put the pipeline deals in place and after leaving government, became a sharholder/director of (4?) Russian utilities.
I doubt if there will be another one, A better option might be ban coalitions. That way the parties are more likely to have to come up with things all agree with. Try to make them work together rather than concentrating on the next election. In some ways that is all they care about.You won't have a referendum on PR until Labour can do some kind of deal with the Liberals.
What you've said is a contradiction: how would banning coalitions make parties more likely to work together?I doubt if there will be another one, A better option might be ban coalitions. That way the parties are more likely to have to come up with things all agree with. Try to make them work together rather than concentrating on the next election. In some ways that is all they care about.
Easy if the group who could form a coalition didn't they could vote to prevent bills being passed. They need to have common ground to form a coalition so it would tend to limit extremes.What you've said is a contradiction: how would banning coalitions make parties more likely to work together?
Napoleon and Hitler thought the same same thing.Russia is no power block, they are a third tier economy, a paper tiger and a former power
Who are or is 'Transparency international'.Transparency International as the top example of corruption in the world at the time