Trent 900

Sponsored Links
I suppose you can put it down to our collective lack of vision and conservative (small c) outlook. Hats off to the French who seem to be able to put together projects and see them through to completion and end up with something usable. Minitel (early internet) was used throughout France to great effect. Their road management information system in Paris appears years ahead of UK. You can see up to the minute maps of road congestion at major airports and train stations. We're beginning to catch up but we seem to be incapable of making the jump between thinking about something and then putting it into practice at a national level.

Even when we do we don't think things through very well e.g. Millenium Dome. If that had been built in Paris it would have been marketed as the the world's greatest event dome. They would have had a plan for it. We built it but didn't know what to do next!!

I'm no particular francophile but we could take a leaf out of their book when it comes to technology and its exploitation.

You can go back to the 1940's and the jet engine. No backing from the WD - couldn't see a future in engines without propellors. Frank Whittle just got on with it scraping together whatever funding he could get. If we'd actually put some money into it it would have been developed earlier and may have made even more of a difference in WW2.

It would be interesting to see if there are any present day examples of projects that could do with a bit of funding to get them going properly - (Beagle was one of them!)
 
And there, is the 'rub', they have to be littered about us ...... but where ?
:cry:
 
IanDB said:
I suppose you can put it down to our collective lack of vision and conservative (small c) outlook. Hats off to the French who seem to be able to put together projects and see them through to completion and end up with something usable. Minitel (early internet) was used throughout France to great effect. Their road management information system in Paris appears years ahead of UK. You can see up to the minute maps of road congestion at major airports and train stations. We're beginning to catch up but we seem to be incapable of making the jump between thinking about something and then putting it into practice at a national level.

Yes, I do envy the way that the French can complete such projects, but there is a good reason they do.

When they built the TGV they thought "What is the quickest way between Paris and city B?" well, actually they thought «What is the quickest way between Paris and city B?», cos they like their quotation marks that way ;) Anyway, what they did was to just bulldoze their way through. The government decided that having really fast trains was a great thing so they flattened everything in the way, hills, villages the lot. But that wouldn't happen here. Why do that when we have perfectly good 200 year old routes. Sure you can only go 140mph instead of 180mph, but you have to weigh the impact of destroying thousands of homes, and disrupting the wildlife, not to mention spending billions against the time saved by building new routes suitable to scoot along at 200mph.

It's the same with motorways. They got into that game rather late, but when we had greens moaning about widening existing 20-30 year old motorways, they were just starting to build theirs. I doubt they would let greens prevent them doing these things.

However, they still don't know how to build an aircraft carrier properly. The Charles de Gaulle keeps true to its name by being larger than it needs to be, incapable of doing its job and being thoroughly ineffective! :LOL:
 
Sponsored Links
Yes, there's an exception to every rule and the CdG is definitely one of them. Not one of their finest designs.
being larger than it needs to be
I believe that in actual fact the flight deck is a few feet too short to land the E-2 plane (or it might be another one). Also these minor shortcomings.

http://www.strategypage.com/dls/articles/2003127.asp

And for sheer front who can forget this? (Just thought I'd throw that one in.)
http://archive.greenpeace.org/comms/rw/pkbomb.html
 
if there are any problems with the British designed ship, the French can blame the British.

Hohoho! I seriously hope they wire the whole thing with UK plug sockets!

Interesting that we decided on a fossil-fuel powered carrier. Will this be the largest conventionally-propelled carrier I wonder?

I had forgotten about the Greenpeace sinking... Wasn't a wise action was it?

Perhaps they should give the CdG to Greenpeace to use as their flagship now? It would be a cunning move on their part, as Greenpeace would never be able protest more than a few miles from the docks. :LOL:
 
Back
Top